Publication:
Histomorphometric evaluation of implants coated with enamel or dentine derived fluoride-substituted apatite

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorOKTAR, FAİK NÜZHET
dc.contributor.authorsKurkcu, Mehmet; Benlidayi, Mehmet Erme; Ozsoy, Serhat; Ozyegin, Luetfiye Sevgi; Oktar, Faik Nuzhet; Kurtoglu, Cem
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T17:35:07Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T17:35:07Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.description.abstractObjectives The aim of this study was to compare osseous healing characteristics of titanium implants coated with enamel-derived fluoride-substituted apatite (EFSA) or dentin-derived fluoride-substituted apatite (DFSA). Methods Fluoride-substituted apatite was derived from extracted human teeth with calcination method at 850 degrees C. DFSA and EFSA were separated and carefully ground with a blade grinder. Twenty-four titanium implants were prepared from a 99.99% pure titanium bar. EFSA and DFSA powders were sprayed separately on implants. As control group, unsprayed and sandblasted pure titanium implants were used. Eight adult rams were used in the study. One EFSA coated, 1 DFSA coated and 1 control implants were placed into right tibia of each rams. The rams were sacrificed after 6 months of healing. Undecalcified sections were prepared according to Donath's method and histomorphometric evaluation of implants was made. Results The mean bone contact percentage of DFSA-coated, EFSA-coated and control implants was 89.88% +/- 2.34, 70.19% +/- 13.11 and 53.12% +/- 5.76 respectively. This study suggests that DFSA-coated implants achieved better bone contact than EFSA-coated implants (P < 0.05). Also study groups presented better bone contact than control group (P < 0.05). Conclusions The results of this study show that although DFSA-coated implants achieved better bone contact, both DFSA and EFSA can be considered as appropriate coating materials.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10856-007-3167-6
dc.identifier.eissn1573-4838
dc.identifier.issn0957-4530
dc.identifier.pubmed17577634
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/229120
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000252278600009
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSPRINGER
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE-MATERIALS IN MEDICINE
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectPLASMA-SPRAYED COATINGS
dc.subjectHYDROXYAPATITE COATINGS
dc.subjectSURFACE CHARACTERISTICS
dc.subjectTITANIUM IMPLANTS
dc.subjectBONE
dc.subjectFLUORAPATITE
dc.subjectHYDROXYLAPATITE
dc.subjectMAGNESIUMWHITLOCKITE
dc.subjectOSSEOINTEGRATION
dc.subjectINTEGRATION
dc.titleHistomorphometric evaluation of implants coated with enamel or dentine derived fluoride-substituted apatite
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.avesis.id99569399-50ef-4527-a5c7-d58d967d9a33
local.import.packageSS17
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atSCOPUS
local.journal.numberofpages7
oaire.citation.endPage65
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.startPage59
oaire.citation.titleJOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE-MATERIALS IN MEDICINE
oaire.citation.volume19
relation.isAuthorOfPublication5ba0a0e0-ebae-43a6-855c-0aabb90021f4
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery5ba0a0e0-ebae-43a6-855c-0aabb90021f4

Files

Collections

Research Outputs