Person: EKİNCİ, GAZANFER
Loading...
Email Address
Birth Date
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Job Title
Last Name
EKİNCİ
First Name
GAZANFER
Name
2 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Publication Metadata only Is any landmark reliable in vertebral enumeration? A study of 3.0-Tesla lumbar MRI comparing skeletal, neural, and vascular markers(ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2014) TÜRELİ, DERYA; Tureli, Derya; Ekinci, Gazanfer; Baltacioglu, FeyyazPurpose: This study aimed to determine the reliability of the iliolumbar ligament (ILL), 12th costa, aortic bifurcation (AB), Tight renal artery (RRA), and conus medullaris (CM) for numbering of vertebral segments. Subjects and methods: Five hundred five patients underwent routine lumbar MRI examinations including a cervicothoracic sagittal scout and T1 and T2-weighted sagittal and axial turbo spin echo images. Images were evaluated by two radiologists separately. Results: The identifiability of ILL and 12th costa were 85.7% and 48.1%. AB, RRA, and CM were located more caudally in lumbarized S1 and more cranially in sacralized L5 cases. Conclusion: Landmarks suggested by previous studies are not reliable alternatives to cervicothoracic scout images due to wide ranges of distribution and inconsistencies in identification. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.Publication Metadata only Utility of Interobserver Agreement Statistics in Establishing Radiology Resident Learning Curves During Self-directed Radiologic Anatomy Training(ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2015) BALTACIOĞLU, FEYYAZ; Tureli, Derya; Altas, Hilal; Cengic, Ismet; Ekinci, Gazanfer; Baltacioglu, FeyyazRationale and Objectives: The aim of the study was to ascertain the learning curves for the radiology residents when first introduced to an anatomic structure in magnetic resonance images (MRI) to which they have not been previously exposed to. Materials and Methods: The iliolumbar ligament is a good marker for testing learning curves of radiology residents because the ligament is not part of a routine lumbar MRI reporting and has high variability in detection. Four radiologists, three residents without previous training and one mentor, studied standard axial T1- and T2-weighted images of routine lumbar MRI examinations. Radiologists had to define iliolumbar ligament while blinded to each other's findings. Interobserver agreement analyses, namely Cohen and Fleiss kappa statistics, were performed for groups of 20 cases to evaluate the self-learning curve of radiology residents. Results: Mean kappa values of resident-mentor pairs were 0.431, 0.608, 0.604, 0.826, and 0.963 in the analysis of successive groups (P <.001). The results indicate that the concordance between the experienced and inexperienced radiologists started as weak (kappa <0.5) and gradually became very acceptable (kappa >0.8). Therefore, a junior radiology resident can obtain enough experience in identifying a rather ambiguous anatomic structure in routine MRI after a brief instruction of a few minutes by a mentor and studying approximately 80 cases by oneself. Conclusions: Implementing this methodology will help radiology educators obtain more concrete ideas on the optimal time and effort required for supported self-directed visual learning processes in resident education.