Person:
ERTÜRK ŞENGEL, BUKET

Profile Picture

Email Address

Birth Date

Research Projects

Organizational Units

OrgUnit Logo
Organizational Unit

Job Title

Last Name

ERTÜRK ŞENGEL

First Name

BUKET

Name

Filters

2022 - 20243
Reset filters

Settings

Author: TİGEN, ELİF × Subject: Health Sciences ×

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • No Thumbnail Available
    PublicationMetadata only
    Clinical Pharmacist-Led Medication Review in Hospitalized Confirmed or Probable Patients with COVID-19 During the First Wave of COVID-19 Pandemic
    (2024-01-01) ÜNDER, DUYGU; ENVER, CÜNEYD; DEMİRCİ, MUHAMMED YASİR; AYHAN, YUNUS EMRE; ÖZGAN, BETÜL; İLERLER, ENES EMİR; OKUYAN, BETÜL; ERTÜRK ŞENGEL, BUKET; KOCAKAYA, DERYA; SİLİ, ULUHAN; TİGEN, ELİF; KARAKURT, SAİT; KORTEN, VOLKAN; SANCAR, MESUT; ÜNDER D., ENVER C., DEMİRCİ M. Y., AYHAN Y. E., ÖZGAN B., İLERLER E. E., OKUYAN B., ERTÜRK ŞENGEL B., KOCAKAYA D., SİLİ U., et al.
    Objectives: Drug-related problems (DRPs) result in serious problems among hospitalized patients, high rates of morbidity and mortality, and increased healthcare costs. This study aimed to identify DRPs by clinical pharmacist-led medication review in hospitalized probable patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at the COVID-19 inpatient services of a tertiary university hospital in Türkiye for 3 months (between March 2020 and June 2020) and included hospitalized confirmed or probable COVID-19 patients. The World Health Organization and Turkish Ministry of Health Guidelines case definitions were used to define confirmed and probable COVID-19 patients. Six clinical pharmacy residents provided medication review services during their education and training. DRPs were classified based on the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe V9.00. The physician’s acceptance rate of clinical pharmacists’ recommendations was assessed. Results: Among 202 hospitalized patients with probable or confirmed COVID-19, 132 (65.3%) had at least one drug-related problem. Two hundred and sixty-four DRPs were identified. Drug selection (85.6%) and dose selection (9.2%) were the most common causes of these problems. Among the 80 clinical pharmacist interventions, 48.8% were accepted by the physicians. Conclusion: Clinical pharmacists identified a significant number of DRPs during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly those related to drug interactions and drug safety, such as adverse drug reactions. This study highlights the importance of detecting and responding to DRPs in the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    PublicationMetadata only
    Prevalence of polypharmacy and potential drug-drug interactions associated with risk factors in the era of hiv integrase inhibitors: A prospective clinical study
    (2023-02-01) YAĞÇI ÇAĞLAYIK, DİLEK; TİGEN, ELİF; SİLİ, ULUHAN; ERTÜRK ŞENGEL, BUKET; KORTEN, VOLKAN; Altunal L. N., YAĞÇI ÇAĞLAYIK D., Ozel A. S., TİGEN E., SİLİ U., ERTÜRK ŞENGEL B., Aydin M., KORTEN V.
    People living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH), with the availability of modern antiretroviral drugs, have multiple comorbidities, which increase the risk of polypharmacy and potential drug-drug interactions (PDDIs). This is a particularly important issue for the aging population of PLWH. This study aims to review the prevalence and risk factors for PDDIs and polypharmacy in the era of HIV integrase inhibitors. A cross-sectional, two-center, prospective observational study was conducted on Turkish outpatients between October 2021 and April 2022. Polypharmacy was defined as the use of >= 5 non-HIV medications, excluding over-the-counter (OTC) drugs, and PDDIs were classified using the University of Liverpool HIV Drug Interaction Database (harmful/red flagged and potentially clinically relevant/amber flagged). The median age of the 502 PLWH included in the study was 42 +/- 12.4 years and 86.1% were males. Most individuals (96.4%) were given integrase-based regimens (unboosted 68.7% and boosted 27.7%). In total, 30.7% of individuals were taking at least one OTC drug. The prevalence of polypharmacy was 6.8% (9.2% when OTC drugs were included). During the study period, the prevalence of PDDIs was 1.2% for red flag PDDIs and 16% for amber flag PDDIs. CD4(+) T cell count >500 cells/mm(3), number of comorbidities >= 3, comedication with drugs affecting blood and blood-forming organs, cardiovascular drugs, and vitamin/mineral supplements were associated with red flag or amber flag PDDIs. Drug interaction prevention is still important in HIV care. Individuals with multiple comorbidities should be closely monitored for non-HIV medications to prevent PDDIs.
  • Thumbnail Image
    PublicationOpen Access
    Comparison of Turkish version of the medical outcomes study-HIV health survey with short form health survey-36 in people living with human immunodeficiency virus
    (2022-07-01) TİGEN, ELİF; ÖZBEN SADIÇ, BESTE; KORTEN, VOLKAN; ERTÜRK ŞENGEL, BUKET; TİGEN E., ERTÜRK ŞENGEL B., ÖZBEN SADIÇ B., KORTEN V.
    Background/aim Several questionnaires have been developed to evaluate the quality of life (QoL) for people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The aim of this study was to compare Turkish version of the Medical Outcomes Study-HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV) with Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) in people with HIV. Patients and methods A hundred and 14 patients with HIV were consecutively included. The MOS-HIV and SF-36 questionnaires were applied to all patients at the same day. MOS HIV included 35 items and assessed general health perceptions (GH), physical functioning (PF), social functioning (SF), mental health (MH), bodily pain (P), cognitive functioning, health distress, overall QoL, health transition, role functioning (RF), energy/vitality (EV), physical (Physical health summary score) and mental (MHSS) health summary scores. SF-36 included 36 items and measured eight domains of health concepts including SF, PF, P, RF, GH, role emotional, vitality (V) and MH. Correlation analysis and Bland- Altman plots were used to compare the MOS-HIV and SF-36 questionnaires. Results GH, PF, P, RF, EV, SF, and MH domains of the MOS-HIV were significantly correlated with those of SF 36. The agreement between the tests were 91.2% for PF, 92.1% for RF and pain, 94.7% for GH, 95.6% for EV, 92.1% for SF and 93.9% for MH. Conclusion Turkish version of the MOS HIV showed moderate correlations and agreement with SF 36 suggesting its use as an alternative to SF 36 in assessing QoL in these patients.