Person:
ERTÜRK ŞENGEL, BUKET

Loading...
Profile Picture

Email Address

Birth Date

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Organizational Unit

Job Title

Last Name

ERTÜRK ŞENGEL

First Name

BUKET

Name

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Publication
    Switch to oral antibiotics in Gram-negative bacteraemia: a randomized, open-label, clinical trial
    (2023-01-01) ERTÜRK ŞENGEL, BUKET; Omrani A. S., Abujarir S. H., Ben Abid F., Shaar S. H., Yilmaz M., Shaukat A., Alsamawi M. S., Elgara M. S., Alghazzawi M. I., Shunnar K. M., et al.
    Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of switching from intravenous (IV) to oral antimicrobial therapy in patients with Enterobacterales bacteraemia, after completion of 3–5 days of microbiologically active IV therapy. Methods: A multicentre, open-label, randomized trial of adults with monomicrobial Enterobacterales bacteraemia caused by a strain susceptible to ≥1 oral beta-lactam, quinolone, or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Inclusion criteria included completion of 3–5 days of microbiologically active IV therapy, being afebrile and haemodynamically stable for ≥48 hours, and absence of an uncontrolled source of infection. Pregnancy, endocarditis, and neurological infections were exclusion criteria. Randomization, stratified by urinary source of bacteraemia, was to continue IV (IV Group) or to switch to oral therapy (Oral Group). Agents and duration of therapy were determined by the treating physicians. The primary endpoint was treatment failure, defined as death, need for additional antimicrobial therapy, microbiological relapse, or infection-related re-admission within 90 days. Non-inferiority threshold was set at 10% in the 95% CI for the difference in the proportion with treatment failure between the Oral and IV Groups in the modified intention-to-treat population. The protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04146922). Results: In the modified intention-to-treat population, treatment failure occurred in 21 of 82 (25.6%) in the IV Group, and 18 of 83 (21.7%) in the Oral Group (risk difference –3.7%, 95% CI –16.6% to 9.2%). The proportions of subjects with any adverse events (AE), serious AE, or AE leading to treatment discontinuation were comparable. Discussion: In patients with Enterobacterales bacteraemia, oral switch, after initial IV antimicrobial therapy, clinical stability, and source control, is non-inferior to continuing IV therapy.
  • PublicationOpen Access
    Medication reconciliation service in hospitalized patients with infectious diseases during coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic: An observational study
    (2023-08-01) ENVER, CÜNEYD; ERTÜRK ŞENGEL, BUKET; SANCAR, MESUT; KORTEN, VOLKAN; OKUYAN, BETÜL; ENVER C., ERTÜRK ŞENGEL B., SANCAR M., KORTEN V., OKUYAN B.
    Objectives: To determine the prevalence and type of medication discrepancies and factors associated with unintentional discrepancies and identify the rate of hospital readmission and emergency service visit within 30 days after discharge among hospitalized patients with infectious diseases and receiving clinical pharmacist-led medication reconciliation during the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Materials and Methods: This observational study was conducted in the internal medicine and infectious diseases wards of a tertiary university hospital between July 2020 and February 2021 among hospitalized adult patients with infectious diseases. Medication reconciliation service (including patient counseling) was provided in person or by telephone. The number and type of medication discrepancies detected during the medication reconciliation services, the acceptance rate of pharmacists’ recommendation, and factors associated with having at least one unintentional medication discrepancy at admission were evaluated. At follow-up, hospital readmission and emergency service visit within 30 days after discharge were assessed by telephone. Results: Among 146 patients, 84 (57.5%) had at least one unintentional discrepancy at admission. Only three unintentional discrepancies were determined in three patients at hospital discharge. All the pharmacists’ recommendations for medication discrepancies were accepted by the physicians. Having COVID-19 [odds ratio (OR): 2.25, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15-4.40; p<0.05], being at a high risk for medication error (OR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.03-3.92; p<0.05), and higher number of medications used at home (OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.23-1.61; p<0.001) were associated with having at least one unintentional discrepancy at admission. The rates of 30 day hospital readmission and admission to the emergency medical service were 12.3% and 15.8%, respectively. Conclusion: Medication reconciliation service provided by in-person or by telephone was useful for detecting and solving unintentional medication discrepancies during the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • PublicationOpen Access
    Demographic and microbiological characteristics of tuberculous lymphadenitis and other extrapulmonary tuberculosis cases
    (2022-01-01) ERTÜRK ŞENGEL, BUKET; Altunal L. N. , ERTÜRK ŞENGEL B., Ozel A. S. , Aydin M., KADANALI A.
    Objective: Tuberculosis (TB) is a significant public health problem that remains important worldwide. This study aimed to examine the demographic characteristics and clinical features of patients with extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) and also identify the comorbidities of EPTB. Our secondary aim was to compare tuberculous lymphadenitis (TBL) with other forms of EPTB.
  • Publication
    Clinical Pharmacist-Led Medication Review in Hospitalized Confirmed or Probable Patients with COVID-19 During the First Wave of COVID-19 Pandemic
    (2024-01-01) ÜNDER, DUYGU; ENVER, CÜNEYD; DEMİRCİ, MUHAMMED YASİR; AYHAN, YUNUS EMRE; ÖZGAN, BETÜL; İLERLER, ENES EMİR; OKUYAN, BETÜL; ERTÜRK ŞENGEL, BUKET; KOCAKAYA, DERYA; SİLİ, ULUHAN; TİGEN, ELİF; KARAKURT, SAİT; KORTEN, VOLKAN; SANCAR, MESUT; ÜNDER D., ENVER C., DEMİRCİ M. Y., AYHAN Y. E., ÖZGAN B., İLERLER E. E., OKUYAN B., ERTÜRK ŞENGEL B., KOCAKAYA D., SİLİ U., et al.
    Objectives: Drug-related problems (DRPs) result in serious problems among hospitalized patients, high rates of morbidity and mortality, and increased healthcare costs. This study aimed to identify DRPs by clinical pharmacist-led medication review in hospitalized probable patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at the COVID-19 inpatient services of a tertiary university hospital in Türkiye for 3 months (between March 2020 and June 2020) and included hospitalized confirmed or probable COVID-19 patients. The World Health Organization and Turkish Ministry of Health Guidelines case definitions were used to define confirmed and probable COVID-19 patients. Six clinical pharmacy residents provided medication review services during their education and training. DRPs were classified based on the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe V9.00. The physician’s acceptance rate of clinical pharmacists’ recommendations was assessed. Results: Among 202 hospitalized patients with probable or confirmed COVID-19, 132 (65.3%) had at least one drug-related problem. Two hundred and sixty-four DRPs were identified. Drug selection (85.6%) and dose selection (9.2%) were the most common causes of these problems. Among the 80 clinical pharmacist interventions, 48.8% were accepted by the physicians. Conclusion: Clinical pharmacists identified a significant number of DRPs during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly those related to drug interactions and drug safety, such as adverse drug reactions. This study highlights the importance of detecting and responding to DRPs in the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • PublicationOpen Access
    Comparison of Turkish version of the medical outcomes study-HIV health survey with short form health survey-36 in people living with human immunodeficiency virus
    (2022-07-01) TİGEN, ELİF; ÖZBEN SADIÇ, BESTE; KORTEN, VOLKAN; ERTÜRK ŞENGEL, BUKET; TİGEN E., ERTÜRK ŞENGEL B., ÖZBEN SADIÇ B., KORTEN V.
    Background/aim Several questionnaires have been developed to evaluate the quality of life (QoL) for people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The aim of this study was to compare Turkish version of the Medical Outcomes Study-HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV) with Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) in people with HIV. Patients and methods A hundred and 14 patients with HIV were consecutively included. The MOS-HIV and SF-36 questionnaires were applied to all patients at the same day. MOS HIV included 35 items and assessed general health perceptions (GH), physical functioning (PF), social functioning (SF), mental health (MH), bodily pain (P), cognitive functioning, health distress, overall QoL, health transition, role functioning (RF), energy/vitality (EV), physical (Physical health summary score) and mental (MHSS) health summary scores. SF-36 included 36 items and measured eight domains of health concepts including SF, PF, P, RF, GH, role emotional, vitality (V) and MH. Correlation analysis and Bland- Altman plots were used to compare the MOS-HIV and SF-36 questionnaires. Results GH, PF, P, RF, EV, SF, and MH domains of the MOS-HIV were significantly correlated with those of SF 36. The agreement between the tests were 91.2% for PF, 92.1% for RF and pain, 94.7% for GH, 95.6% for EV, 92.1% for SF and 93.9% for MH. Conclusion Turkish version of the MOS HIV showed moderate correlations and agreement with SF 36 suggesting its use as an alternative to SF 36 in assessing QoL in these patients.