Person:
UMUROĞLU, TÜMAY

Loading...
Profile Picture

Email Address

Birth Date

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Organizational Unit

Job Title

Last Name

UMUROĞLU

First Name

TÜMAY

Name

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • PublicationOpen Access
    Targeted bleeding management guided by non-invasive haemoglobin measurement in surgical patients
    (2022-10-01) AKDAĞ, ŞÜKRİYE; ZENGİN, SENİYYE ÜLGEN; UMUROĞLU, TÜMAY; AYKAÇ, ZEYNEP ZUHAL; SARAÇOĞLU, AYTEN; AKDAĞ Ş., ZENGİN S. Ü. , Cakmak G., UMUROĞLU T., AYKAÇ Z. Z. , SARAÇOĞLU A.
    © 2022 College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan. All rights reserved.Objective: To assess blood transfusion decisions in blood losses using a continuous total haemoglobin (SpHb) and non-invasive haemoglobin (Hb) device. Study Design: Double-blinded randomised controlled trial. Place and Duration of Study: Marmara University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, from March 2018 to December 2019. Methodology: One hundred and twenty adult patients scheduled for elective major surgery and expected to experience a blood loss greater than 20% of their total blood volume were divided into two groups. These groups were compared for bleeding management with conventional blood gas sampling (Group Hb, the control group) according to Hb monitoring versus SpHb measurement (Group SpHb, the study group). Results: In the postoperative measurement, there were fewer red blood cells (RBC) in the SpHb group than in the Hb group (p=0.020). There was a greater change in the amount of RBC from the perioperative to the postoperative period in the SpHb group compared to the Hb group (p<0.001). Postoperative Hb levels of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) were higher in the SpHb group than in the Hb group (p<0.05). Conclusion: SpHb can provide effective patient blood management in cases of major surgery. It does not cause a delay in the decision of blood transfusion during surgery.
  • PublicationOpen Access
    Comparative efficacy of finger versus forehead plethysmographic variability index monitoring in pediatric surgical patients
    (2022-10-01) FİDAN, SEYFULLAH; ZENGİN, SENİYYE ÜLGEN; ORHON ERGÜN, MELİHA; UMUROĞLU, TÜMAY; Fidan S., ZENGİN S. Ü. , ORHON ERGÜN M., UMUROĞLU T.
    Introduction The Plethysmographic Variability Index can be measured by both finger and forehead probes. Vasoconstriction may jeopardize the reliability of finger PVI measurements in pediatric patients undergoing surgery. However, forehead vasculature exhibits more marked resistance to alterations in the vasomotor tonus. Objective Our aim was to compare the Plethysmographic Variability Index measured via finger or forehead probes in mechanically ventilated pediatric surgery patients in terms of their ability to predict fluid responsiveness as well as to determine the best cut-off values for these two measurements. Materials and Methods A total of 50 pediatric patients undergoing minor elective surgery were included after provision of parental consent and ethics committee approval. Perfusion index measured at the finger or forehead and Plethysmographic Variability Index monitoring comprised the primary assessments. Hemodynamic parameters monitored included perfusion index, Plethysmographic Variability Index, and cardiac output. A >= 15% increase in cardiac output following passive leg raise maneuver was considered to show fluid responsiveness. Two groups were defined based on fluid responsiveness: Group R (responsive) and Group NR (non-responsive). Student\"s t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, DeLong test, and ROC were used for statistical analysis. Results The area under curve for finger and forehead Plethysmographic Variability Index prior to passive leg raise maneuver were 0.699 (p = .011) and 0.847 (p < .001), respectively. The sensitivity for finger and forehead measurements at a cut-off value of <= 14% was 92.9% and 96.4%, and 45.4% and 72.7%, respectively. Conclusion Although forehead and finger Plethysmographic Variability Index monitoring were similarly sensitive in predicting fluid responsiveness in pediatric surgical patients, the former method provided higher specificity. The best cut-off value for PVI measurements with forehead and finger probes was found to be 14%.