Person:
GÜLPINAR, MEHMET ALİ

Profile Picture

Email Address

Birth Date

Research Projects

Organizational Units

OrgUnit Logo
Organizational Unit

Job Title

Last Name

GÜLPINAR

First Name

MEHMET ALİ

Name

Filters

20232
Reset filters

Settings

Author: AKDENİZ, ESRA ×

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    PublicationOpen Access
    Adaptation of the professionalism mini-evaluation exercise instrument into Turkish: a validity and reliability study
    (2023-12-01) AKDENİZ, ESRA; GÜLPINAR, MEHMET ALİ; Taşçı A. İ., AKDENİZ E., GÜLPINAR M. A., Danacıoğlu Y. O., Sarı E. E., Yaşar L., Karandere F., Ferahman S.
    Background: There is an ongoing search for standardized scales appropriate for each culture to evaluate professionalism, which is one of the basic competencies of a physician. The Professionalism Mini-evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) instrument was originally developed in Canada to meet this need. In this study, it was aimed to adapt the P-MEX to Turkish and to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version. Methods: A total of 58 residents at Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital were assessed with the Turkish version of P-MEX by 24 raters consisting of faculty members, attending physicians, peer residents, and nurses during patient room visits, outpatient clinic and group practices. For construct validity, the confirmatory factor analysis was performed. For reliability, Cronbach’s alpha scores were calculated. Generalizibility and decision studies were undertaken to predict the reliability of the validated tool under different conditions. After the administration of P-MEX was completed, the participants were asked to provide feedback on the acceptability, feasibility, and educational impact of the instrument. Results: A total of 696 forms were obtained from the administration of P-MEX. The content validity of P-MEX was found to be appropriate by the faculty members. In the confirmatory factor analysis of the original structure of the 24-item Turkish scale, the goodness-of-fit parameters were calculated as follows: CFI = 0.675, TLI = 0.604, and RMSEA = 0.089. In the second stage, the factors on which the items loaded were changed without removing any item, and the model was modified. For the modified model, the CFI, TLI, and RMSEA values were calculated as 0.857, 0.834, and 0.057, respectively. The decision study on the results obtained from the use of P-MEX in a Turkish population revealed the necessity to perform this evaluation 18 times to correctly evaluate professionalism with this instrument. Cronbach’s alpha score was 0.844. All the faculty members provided positive feedback on the acceptability, feasibility, and educational impact of the adapted P-MEX. Conclusion: The findings of this study showed that the Turkish version of P-MEX had sufficient validity and reliability in assessing professionalism among residents. Similarly, the acceptability and feasibility of the instrument were found to be high, and it had a positive impact on education. Trial registration: 2020/249, Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital.
  • Thumbnail Image
    PublicationOpen Access
    The evaluation of the processes of problem based learning tutorials: Online or face-to-face
    (2023-10-01) EMRE, ÖZGE; AKDENİZ, ESRA; GÜLPINAR, MEHMET ALİ; GAYEF A., EMRE Ö., AKDENİZ E., GÜLPINAR M. A.
    Objective: The purpose of this research is to evaluate e-PBL tutorials and compare these sessions with face-to-face PBL sessions. Materials and Methods: This research is a program evaluation study in which quantitative methods were used. In the research, four 90-minute e-PBL sessions held between April and June 2020 were evaluated. Sessions conducted online were realised using the sevenstep approach in groups of 13-14 students and a tutor. Video recordings were analysed with the thin slicing method. In addition, various quantitative data on evaluation were analysed using multiple tools and materials, including the end-of-program evaluation form. Friedman test and Mann-Whitney U test were used in the analyses of quantitative data. Results: Upon evaluating the analyses of the feedback received from the students about the structure, content and process of the program regarding the e-PBL tutorials, the students gave a positive opinion of 80% or more. In regards with the cases, the students had positive opinions of over 80% in terms of “motivation for learning and researching”, “daily life and its relation to their individual development”, “suitability to their levels of knowledge and skills”, “reinforcement of topics”. Support, guidance and feedback received from the tutor as a group and individually during online tutorials were statistically significantly higher than the face-to-face PBL tutorials (P<0.05). Conclusion: Research on the effectiveness of e-PBL tutorials, including ours, point out that e-PBL practices may constitute a viable alternative besides face-to face ones. However, for a sounder framing and better results, the subject should be studied in different aspects and more evidences be gathered in this area. These studies will provide evidence to educational institutions and practitioners on how to adapt and modify educational practices, including PBL.