Person:
KURU ÇOLAK, TUĞBA

Profile Picture

Email Address

Birth Date

Research Projects

Organizational Units

OrgUnit Logo
Organizational Unit

Job Title

Last Name

KURU ÇOLAK

First Name

TUĞBA

Name

Filters

2019 - 201912020 - 20243
Reset filters

Settings

Author: POLAT, MİNE GÜLDEN ×

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • No Thumbnail Available
    PublicationMetadata only
    Relationship between frontal plane trunk asymmetryand sagittal radiographic parameters İn adolescents idiopathic scoliosis patients
    (2019-04-13) POLAT, MİNE GÜLDEN; KURU ÇOLAK, TUĞBA; Bodur M., Öncü A., KARABACAK N., ÇAKIR F., Turan K., Torlakçık M., POLAT M. G., KURU ÇOLAK T.
  • Thumbnail Image
    PublicationOpen Access
    Effects of rigid and kinesio taping on plantar pressure distribution in patients with Lisfranc fracture sequelae.
    (2023-11-01) ÖZEN BERKOL, TUĞÇE; KURU ÇOLAK, TUĞBA; POLAT, MİNE GÜLDEN; ÖZTÜRK O., ÖZEN T., KURU ÇOLAK T., ECEVİZ E., ÇOLAK İ., POLAT M. G.
    Background: Patients with Lisfranc fractures may regain functional status after anatomical fixation, but they may experience sequelae such as flatfoot deformity and pain associated with foot pressure distribution during weightbearing. Research question:: What is the impact of Lisfranc fracture sequelae on both the injured and uninjured sides, and how does the antipronation taping affect plantar pressure distribution parameters? Methods: Twenty-six patients who underwent anatomical fixation for Lisfranc fracture, displaying pronation on the injured side based on the Foot Posture Index-6 test, as well as 15 healthy subjects, participated in this study. Plantar pressure distribution measurements were conducted during barefoot walking for the healthy subjects. In the patient group, measurements were taken under two antipronation taping conditions (kinesio and rigid taping), as well as during barefoot walking. Results: Participants who received anatomical fixation after Lisfranc fracture exhibited significant alterations in plantar pressure distribution parameters on both the injured and uninjured sides, as compared to the control group. After the application of Kinesio Taping to the injured side, there was no significant change observed in the plantar pressure distribution values (p > 0.05). The analysis of the rigid taping on the injured side revealed statistically worse values in peak pressure of the hindfoot (p = 0.027) and maximum force of the midfoot and toes (p = 0.005 and p = 0.013, respectively) compared to the injured barefoot condition. Significance: Lisfranc fracture sequelae affected plantar pressure distribution on both injured and uninjured sides. Anti-pronation taping (kinesio and rigit), commonly used for foot conditions, did not lead to foot pressure distribution becoming more similar to that of the control group.
  • Thumbnail Image
    PublicationOpen Access
    Sağlıklı genç bireylerde “Marmara balance and education system (marbes)” cihazı kullanılarak değerlendirilen denge ve koordinasyon ölçümlerinin güvenilirliği
    (2022-12-01) KURU ÇOLAK, TUĞBA; ÖZEN BERKOL, TUĞÇE; SARI, ZÜBEYİR; POLAT, MİNE GÜLDEN; DOĞAN, BARIŞ; TARIM, MEHVEŞ; KURU ÇOLAK T., ÖZEN BERKOL T., GÜNAY YAZICI C., SARI D. M., KARABACAK N., SARI Z., POLAT M. G., DOĞAN B., TARIM M.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    PublicationMetadata only
    The Treatment Expectation Questionnaire Tool: A Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation in Turkey
    (2024-01-01) ÖZTÜRK, MEHMET SAADEDDİN; KURU ÇOLAK, TUĞBA; SARI, ZÜBEYİR; POLAT, MİNE GÜLDEN; Cakir F., Gercek H., ÖZTÜRK M. S., KURU ÇOLAK T., SARI Z., POLAT M. G.
    Patients’ general treatment expectations are an important indicator of the outcomes of the various treatments they will receive. There is a need for valid and reliable assessment tools that measure the expectations of patients receiving rehabilitation services. This study aimed to translate and validate the Treatment Expectations Questionnaire (TR.TEX-Q) in Turkish patients to assess their treatment-specific expectations. 150 physiotherapy patients were enrolled in the study. The original version of the Treatment Expectation Questionnaire was translated into Turkish. Cronbach’s α was used to investigate internal consistency. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to assess test–retest reliability. Pearsons’s correlation was used to calculate convergent and divergent validity. Principal component analysis produced a 15-items scale which had a 6-factors structure. Cronbach’s α values ranged from.649 to.879. Test–retest reliability was high for total score and for all subscales. The ICC was between.622 and.852, p <.001. TR.TEX-Q showed good convergent validity, a moderate correlation was found between the Positivity Scale (rho =.45, p <.001). For divergent validity, low to moderate correlation was found between the TR.TEX-Q and the HADS scores. The Turkish version of Treatment Expectation Questionnaire has good reliability and validity data in terms of evaluating the treatment expectations of patients who will receive physiotherapy.