Person: SANCAR, MESUT
Loading...
Email Address
Birth Date
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Job Title
Last Name
SANCAR
First Name
MESUT
Name
2 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Publication Metadata only Comparison of the protective effects of various antiulcer agents alone or in combination on indomethacin-induced gastric ulcers in rats(ELSEVIER GMBH, 2012) OKUYAN, BETÜL; Izzettin, Fikret Vehbi; Sancar, Mesut; Okuyan, Betul; Apikoglu-Rabus, Sule; Cevikbas, UgurThe aim of this study which was structured with the objective of determination of the optimum protective therapy against the long term NSAID therapy-induced ulcers was to compare the gastro-protective effects of various antiulcer drugs (ranitidine, omeprazole, bismuth and misoprostol)alone or in combination with each other in different doses on indomethacin-induced gastric ulcers in rats. In this experimental study the protective effect of misoprostol (100 mu g/kg/day and 10 mu g/kg/day i.g.), omeprazole (5 mg/kg/day and 1.5 mg/kg/day i.p.), ranitidine (40 mg/kg/day and 10 mg/kg/day i.p.), bismuth (70 mg/kg/day and 15 mg/kg/day i.g.), combinations of misoprostol (10 mu g/kg/day i.g.) plus omeprazole (1.5 mg/kg/day i.p.) and misoprostol (10 mu g/kg/day i.g.) plus ranitidine (10 mg/kg/day i.p.) are investigated on indomethacin (50 mg/kg/day s.c.) induced gastric ulcers. Half an hour before indomethacin administration, each group received the above treatment regimens for 5 days. After 5-day treatment, the rats were sacrificed and histopathological and hematological examinations were performed. The following regimens were found to be effective in the prevention of indomethacin-induced gastric lesions: 100 mu g/kg misoprostol, 10 mu g/kg misoprostol, 5 mg/kg omeprazole, combination of 10 mu g/kg misoprostol plus 1.5 mg/kg omeprazole and 10 mu g/kg misoprostol plus 10 mg/kg ranitidine. The prevention rates achieved by these treatments were 71.4%, 50%, 47.6%, 52.4% and 50%, respectively. As a result of this study, misoprostol and omeprazol were found to be effective in protection against NSAID-induced gastric problems: while, ranitidine and bismuth were not. Also, the combinations of these agents were not found to have additive or synergistic effects. (C) 2010 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.Publication Metadata only Pharmacoeconomic comparison of Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens(SPRINGER, 2006) SANCAR, MESUT; Sancar, Mesut; Izzettin, Fikret Vehbi; Apikoglu-Rabus, Sule; Besisik, Fatih; Tozun, Nurdan; Dulger, GulBackground Helicobacter pylori is the most important etiologic agent for development of peptic ulcer, chronic gastritis and gastric carcinomas. It is now well established that H. pylori eradication treatment is more cost-effective than acid suppressing therapies alone for the treatment of peptic ulcer disease. However, the comparative cost-effectiveness of various H. pylori eradication regimens is still not clear. Objective This study was designed to make a pharmacoeconomic comparison of different H. pylori eradication regimens in patients with peptic ulcer disease or chronic gastritis, using real-world cost and effectiveness data. Setting Istanbul University Hospital and Marmara University Hospital. Method A total of 75 patients diagnosed as H. pylori (+) by endoscopy were randomized to receive one of the seven H. pylori treatment protocols. These protocols were as follows: (LAC) = 'lansoprazole 30 mg bid + amoxicillin 1 g bid + clarithromycin 500 mg bid' for 7 days and (OCM) = 'omeprazole 20 mg bid + clarithromycin 250 mg bid + metronidazole 500 mg bid'; (OAM) = 'omeprazole 40 mg qd + amoxicillin 500 mg tid + metronidazole 500 mg tid'; (MARB) = 'metronidazole 250 mg tid + amoxicillin 500 mg qid + ranitidine 300 mg hs + bismuth 300 mg qid'; (OAC) = omeprazole 20 mg bid + amoxicillin 1 g bid + clarithromycin 500 mg bid'; (OCA) = omeprazole 40 mg bid + clarithromycin 500 mg bid + amoxicillin 1 g bid'; (OAB) = 'omeprazole 20 mg bid + amoxicillin 500 mg tid + bismuth 300 mg qid' each for 14 days. Only direct costs were included in the analysis. Effectiveness was measured in terms of successful eradication. The cost-effectiveness ratios of the regimens were calculated using these effectiveness and cost data. The perspective of the study was assumed as the Government's perspective. Main outcome measures Cost-effectiveness ratios of eradication regimens. Results MARB and OCA regimens were found to be more cost-effective than the other treatment regimens. The eradication rates and cost-effectiveness ratios calculated for these protocols were 90% (EURO158.7) for MARB and 90% (EURO195.8) for OCA regimen. Conclusions This study confirms the importance of using local pharmacoeconomic data. Analyses such as this give decision-makers the tools to choose a better treatment option which is both highly effective yet and has a low cost.