Person: AKYÜZ, GÜLSEREN DERYA
Loading...
Email Address
Birth Date
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Job Title
Last Name
AKYÜZ
First Name
GÜLSEREN DERYA
Name
2 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Publication Metadata only The Effectiveness of Kinesiotaping, Sham Taping or Exercises Only in Lateral Epicondylitis Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Study(WILEY, 2019) AKYÜZ, GÜLSEREN DERYA; Giray, Esra; Karali-Bingul, Duygu; Akyuz, GulserenBackground: Lateral epicondylitis is a common musculoskeletal condition presenting with pain and tenderness over the lateral epicondyle and dorsal forearm, pain and weakness in gripping and limitations in daily activities. It is proposed that kinesiotaping, a new application of adhesive taping, reduces pain and improves muscle function. Objective: To compare efficacy of kinesiotaping, sham taping, or exercises only in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis. Design: Double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Setting: Tertiary medical center, university hospital. Participants: Thirty patients with lateral epicondylitis for less than 12weeks. Methods or Interventions: Patients were randomized into three groups: kinesiotaping plus exercises (n = 10), sham taping plus exercises (n = 10), and control (exercises only) (n = 10) groups. All recipients were provided a home exercise program including strengthening and stretching exercises. In kinesiotaping and sham taping groups, tapings were performed and changed every 3-4 d for 2 weeks. Main Outcome Measure(s): The primary outcome was the patient-rated tennis elbow evaluation (PRTEE). Pain visual analogue scale (VAS), grip strength, and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (QuickDASH) scales were secondary outcomes. Evaluations were done at baseline, posttreatment, and at 4 weeks after treatment. The immediate effect was also assessed by VAS and grip strength immediately after real and sham tapings. Results: PRTEE total scores at posttreatment and at 4 weeks after treatment were statistically significantly lower in kinesiotaping plus exercises group compared to sham taping plus exercises group and exercises only group. The effects of kinesiotaping were larger than sham taping and only exercises at posttreatment (d = -1.21, d = -1.33) and at 4 weeks after treatment (d = -1.39, d = -1.34). Repeated-measures anova showed a significant interaction between the time and the groups (F 2950 = 4849; P = .006). Significant between-group differences were found in QuickDASH score and VAS at rest at 4 weeks after treatment, VAS at daily activity at posttreatment and 4 weeks after treatment when kinesiotaping plus exercises and sham taping plus exercises groups and kinesiotaping plus exercises and exercises only groups were compared. Real taping but not sham taping immediately led to an increase in grip strength, decrease in VAS at rest and VAS at daily activity (P = .0017, P = .041, P = .028; respectively). Conclusions: Kinesiotaping in addition to exercises is more effective than sham taping and exercises only in improving pain in daily activities and arm disability due to lateral epicondylitis.Publication Metadata only Comparison of Conventional Pulmonary Rehabilitation and High-Frequency Chest Wall Oscillation In Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia(WILEY-BLACKWELL, 2014) KARADAĞ, BÜLENT TANER; Gokdemir, Yasemin; Karadag-Saygi, Evrim; Erdem, Ela; Bayindir, Ozun; Ersu, Refika; Karadag, Bulent; Sekban, Nimet; Akyuz, Gulseren; Karakoc, FaziletBackgroundEnhancement of mucociliary clearance by pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is advocated in primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD). Our primary aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of postural drainage, percussion and vibration [conventional PR (CPR)], and high frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) by studying change in pulmonary function. Our secondary aim was to evaluate patient preferences regarding the two methods. MethodsThis was a controlled randomized crossover study. PCD patients between the ages of 7 and 18 years were assigned to two groups, first group performed airway clearance with CPR at hospital for 5 days and after a 2-day washout period HFCWO was applied to the same group at home. HFCWO was applied first to the other group and then these patients were hospitalized for CPR. The primary outcome measure of the study was pulmonary function test (PFT). The secondary outcomes were pulse arterial oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) and the perceived efficiency and comfort level. ResultsPFT values of patients increased significantly after both PR methods (before/after): CPR: FVC: 77.014.1/81.8 +/- 13.0 (P=0.002); FEV1: 72.9 +/- 14.8/78.7 +/- 13.5 (P=0.001); PEF: 73.8 +/- 14.5/82.5 +/- 14.5 (P=0.001); FEF25-75: 68.6 +/- 27.6/74.9 +/- 29.3 (P=0.007). HFCWO: FVC: 75.1 +/- 15.3/80.3 +/- 13.9 (P=0.002); FEV1: 71.4 +/- 16/77.4 +/- 14.6 (P=0.001); PEF: 70.9 +/- 18.0/78.3 +/- 17.7 (P=0.002); FEF25-75: 70.5 +/- 23.4/76.4 +/- 25.6 (P=0.006). There were no significant differences in % predicted FVC, FEV1, PEF, and FEF25-75 increased values with CPR and HFCWO. HFCWO was found more comfortable (P=0.04). Two PR methods were found efficient and no desaturation occurred during PR. ConclusionsPFTs were significantly increased after both PR methods. There were no differences in PFTs and SpO(2) between the CPR and HFCWO groups. Both PR methods were found efficient. HFCWO was found more comfortable. HFCWO may be an option in patients with chronic pulmonary disease and low adherence to PR. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014; 49:611-616. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.