Person:
ERGELEN, RABİA

Profile Picture

Email Address

Birth Date

Research Projects

Organizational Units

OrgUnit Logo
Organizational Unit

Job Title

Last Name

ERGELEN

First Name

RABİA

Name

Filters

2014 - 20162
Reset filters

Settings

Author: YILMAZ, YUSUF × Subject: Fibroscan ×

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    PublicationMetadata only
    A comparison of FibroMeter (TM) NAFLD Score, NAFLD fibrosis score, and transient elastography as noninvasive diagnostic tools for hepatic fibrosis in patients with biopsy-proven non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
    (INFORMA HEALTHCARE, 2014) ÇELİKEL, ÇİĞDEM; Aykut, Umut Emre; Akyuz, Umit; Yesil, Atakan; Eren, Fatih; Gerin, Fatma; Ergelen, Rabia; Celikel, Cigdem Ataizi; Yilmaz, Yusuf
    Background: Noninvasive markers that purport to distinguish patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) with fibrosis from those without must be evaluated rigorously for their classification accuracy. Herein, we seek to compare the diagnostic performances of three different noninvasive methods (FibroMeter (TM) NAFLD score, NAFLD Fibrosis score (NFSA), and Transient Elastrography [TE]) for the detection of liver fibrosis in NAFLD patients. Methods: A total of 88 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD were included. The Kleiner system was used for grading fibrosis in liver biopsies. The FibroMeter (TM) NAFLD score was determined using a proprietary algorithm (regression score). The NFSA score was calculated based on age, hyperglycemia, body mass index, platelets, albumin and serum aminotransferase levels. TE was performed using the Fibroscan apparatus. Results: The sensitivities/specificities for the FibroMeter (TM) NAFLD score, NFSA, and TE for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis (F2 + F3 + F4 fibrosis) were 38.6%/86.4%, 52.3%/88.6%, and 75.0%/93.2%, respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of TE were significantly higher than those of both the FibroMeter (TM) NAFLD score and NFSA. No significant differences were found between the FibroMeter (TM) NAFLD score and NFSA for the detection of significant and severe fibrosis, although the diagnostic performance of the FibroMeter (TM) NAFLD score was higher than that of the NFSA score for cirrhosis. Conclusions: In summary, TE showed the best diagnostic performance for the noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis in NAFLD patients. The diagnostic performances of the FibroMeter (TM) NAFLD score and NFSA did not differ significantly for the detection of both significant and severe fibrosis.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    PublicationMetadata only
    Comparison of Doppler ultrasound and transient elastography in the diagnosis of significant fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis
    (SPRINGER, 2016) ÇELİKEL, ÇİĞDEM; Ergelen, Rabia; Yilmaz, Yusuf; Asedov, Ruslan; Celikel, Cigdem; Akin, Hakan; Bugdayci, Onur; Altun, Ersan; Tuney, Davut
    Background: Liver fibrosis is an important prognostic determinant in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Hepatic artery resistivity index (HARI) is a doppler ultrasonography (US) parameter that is used to follow up microcirculatory resistance in fatty liver. We aimed to asses whether it is possible to demonstrate significant fibrosis by means of doppler US in comparison with transient elastography (TE) and liver biopsy in NASH patients. Patients and methods: A total of 63 (mean age 47.1 +/- 8.4 years, 39 male, 24 female) biopsy-proven NASH patients were enrolled in this prospective study. The study population was classified into two groups: significant and no-significant fibrosis patients. Doppler US and TE were performed in two groups. Results: HARI and TE values were significantly higher in significant fibrosis group (0.81 +/- 0.05 vs. 0.63 +/- 0.14, p < 0.0005; 15.9 +/- 4.8 vs. 6.2 +/- 2.6 kilopascals, p < 0.0005; respectively). Based on the ROC curve, the optimal cut-off value of HARI for a significant fibrosis was >0.75, which yielded a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 75%, with the area under the curve at 0.90. The optimal cut-off value of TE for a significant fibrosis was >9.8 kilopascals, which yielded a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 91%, with the area under the curve at 0.95. HARI values were moderately correlated with TE values (r = 0.53, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Doppler US has moderate % sensitivity and % specificity, which is lower compared with TE for the diagnosis significant fibrosis. However, it may be used as an alternative method for the assessment of fibrosis in patients with NASH who are not good candidates for TE evaluation.