Person: BAŞOĞLU TÜYLÜ, TUĞBA
Loading...
Email Address
Birth Date
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Job Title
Last Name
BAŞOĞLU TÜYLÜ
First Name
TUĞBA
Name
4 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Publication Metadata only QT interval prolongation related to afatinib treatment in a patient with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer(MOSBY-ELSEVIER, 2020) KOCAKAYA, DERYA; Demircan, Nazim Can; Telli, Tugba Akin; Tuylu, Tugba Basoglu; Arikan, Rukiye; Kocakaya, Derya; Sahin, Ahmet Anil; Ercelep, Ozlem; Dane, Faysal; Yumuk, Perran FuldenAfatinib improves survival in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer driven by activating epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. QT interval prolongation is a possible side effect of tar geted anticancer drugs, but this has not been reported before with afatinib. We report a case of metastatic pulmonary adenocarcinoma with epidermal growth factor receptor exon 19 deletion who was treated with first-line afatinib. The patient was started on afatinib with a total dose of 40 mg/day and experienced grade 3 (> 500 ms) QT interval prolongation in the seventh week. Dose was interrupted and then reduced to 30 mg/day after the event repeated. QT prolongation occurred only once with the reduced dose and radiologic oligoprogression was detected. Local therapy was performed and afatinib was continued as 30 mg/day. To the best of our knowledge, this case marks the first QT interval prolongation associated with afatinib. It is prudent to perform a baseline cardiologic evaluation and electrocardiogram monitoring in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with this drug. (c) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.Publication Metadata only The real-life efficacy and safety of osimertinib in pretreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with T790M mutation: a Turkish Oncology Group Study(SPRINGER) YUMUK, PERRAN FULDEN; Hizal, Mutlu; Bilgin, Burak; Paksoy, Nail; Acikgoz, Ozgur; Sezer, Ahmet; Gurbuz, Mustafa; Ak, Naziye; Yucel, Sebnem; Ayhan, Murat; Erol, Cihan; Demirkiran, Aykut; Mandel, Nil Molinas; Shbair, Abdallah; Gokmen, Ivo; Basoglu, Tugba; Paydas, Semra; Demiray, Atike Gokcen; Iriagac, Yakup; Sakalar, Teoman; Zeynelgil, Esra; Tatli, Ali Murat; Bahceci, Aykut; Guven, Deniz Can; Caner, Burcu; Can, Alper; Gulmez, Ahmet; Karakas, Yusuf; Yalcin, Bulent; Demirkazik, Ahmet; Bilici, Ahmet; Aydiner, Adnan; Yumuk, Perran Fulden; Sendur, Mehmet Ali NahitIntroduction Osimertinib, an irreversible third-generation EGFR-TKI, is the standard of care for second-line treatment of T790M-mutant advanced NSCLC patients whose disease progressed after first-line EGFR-TKI therapy. In this multicenter study, we aimed to determine the real-life efficacy and safety of Osimertinib in pretreated advanced NSCLC patients with T790M mutation. Materials and methods This retrospective trial included advanced T790M-mutant pretreated NSCLC patients who received Osimertinib from 24 different centers in Turkey. Primary endpoint was time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD). Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results Of 163 patients, 68.7% had EGFR exon 19 deletion and 22.7% had exon 21 L858R mutation. Osimertinib was given as second-line treatment in 96 patients (58.9%) and third-line in 48 patients (29.4%). After median of 13-month follow-up, median TTD was 21.6 months with an 82.2% ORR. Estimated median OS was 32.1 months. Grade 3-4 adverse events were seen in 11.7% of the patients. Conclusion Osimertinib is a highly effective option in second- or third-line treatment of NSCLC patients with T790M mutation, with a favorable safety profile.Publication Open Access Is insulin resistance a predictor for complete response in breast cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment?(BMC, 2020-12) DANE, FAYSAL; Alan, Ozkan; Akin Telli, Tugba; Aktas, Bilge; Koca, Sinan; Okten, Ilker Nihat; Hasanov, Rahib; Basoglu, Tugba; Arikan, Rukiye; Demircan, Nazim Can; Ercelep, Ozlem; Kaya, Serap; Ugurlu, Mustafa Umit; Kaya, Handan; Akgul Babacan, Nalan; Dane, Faysal; Yumuk, Perran FuldenPurpose Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the standard front-line treatment modality in locally advanced breast cancer. Achieving pathological complete response (pCR) is a significant prognostic factor for prolonged disease-free and overall survival. Insulin resistance is defined as a pathological condition in which insulin effect is impaired in peripheral target tissues such as the skeletal muscle, liver, and adipose tissue. The relationship between breast cancer and insulin resistance is controversial. In this study, our aim is to evaluate the role of insulin resistance, body mass index (BMI), metabolic syndrome, and inflammation markers to predict complete response in breast cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment. Methods Data from 55 locally advanced non-diabetic breast cancer patients, treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2015 and 2017, were retrospectively evaluated. Homeostatic model assessment, IR = insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated by using the obtained insulin and fasting blood glucose values before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (fasting insulin x fasting glucose/405). We considered a cut-off of 2.5 for insulin resistance. The systemic inflammatory index (SII), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were calculated. Results Twenty-five patients had no insulin resistance. The most common pathologic subtype (56%) was hormone receptor (HR) positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (Her-2)-negative invasive ductal carcinoma. Sixteen (29%) patients had a pathological complete response (pCR). We found that the probability of pCR in patients with insulin resistance was 4.7 times lower than that in patients without insulin resistance [OR: 4.7 (95%CI 1.7-17.2),p= 0.01]. Conclusion Our results revealed that insulin resistance may have a negative effect on pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant therapy particularly with hormone-positive and Her-2-negative cases of non-diabetic breast cancer.Publication Open Access Association of Pre-treatment Sarcopenia with Side Effects and Prognosis in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Erlotinib(2022-08-01) DEMİRCAN, NAZIM CAN; ENGÜR, CEREN ÖZGE; AKIN TELLİ, TUĞBA; BAŞOĞLU TÜYLÜ, TUĞBA; ARIKAN, RUKİYE; ÖZGÜVEN, SALİH; DANE, FAYSAL; KAYA, HANDAN; ÖNEŞ, TUNÇ; YUMUK, PERRAN FULDEN; DEMİRCAN N. C. , ENGÜR C. Ö. , AKIN TELLİ T., BAŞOĞLU TÜYLÜ T., Arikan R., Yasar A., Celebi A., Alan O., Isik S., ÖZGÜVEN S., et al.OBJECTIVE We investigated the relationship of baseline sarcopenia with toxicities, treatment response, and survival in patients who had non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and received erlotinib.METHODS Computed tomography images from PET/CT scans before erlotinib treatment were retrospectively assessed. Skeletal muscle index, calculated as skeletal muscle area at third lumbar vertebra level/square of height, was used to define sarcopenia with < 52.4 cm2/m2 for males and < 38.5 cm2/m2 for females. Cox hazard models were conducted to determine predictors of survival.RESULTS The study included 30 patients, and 11 (36.7%) were sarcopenic. All-grade and Grade 3 toxicities were more frequent in sarcopenic group, although it was statistically insignificant (81.8% vs. 63.2%, p=0.282 for all-grade, and 18.2% vs. 10.5%, p=0.552 for grade 3). Response rates were 63.6% in sarcopenic and 68.4% in non-sarcopenic patients (p=0.789). Median progression-free survival was 7.9 and 9.2 months in sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic cases, respectively (p=0.561). However, median overall survival (OS) of sarcopenic patients was significantly shorter than non-sarcopenic ones (11.8 vs. 30.2 months, p=0.023), and sarcopenia predicted OS independently in multivariate analysis (Hazard ratio=2.63, p=0.029).CONCLUSION Early recognition, treatment, and prevention of sarcopenia may improve long-term survival in EGFRmutant NSCLC patients treated with first-line erlotinib.