Person:
YILMAZ, HANİFE NURAY

Loading...
Profile Picture

Email Address

Birth Date

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Job Title

Last Name

YILMAZ

First Name

HANİFE NURAY

Name

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • PublicationOpen Access
    Corticotomy-assisted maxillary protraction with skeletal anchorage and Class III elastics
    (E H ANGLE EDUCATION RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC, 2015-01) GARİP, HASAN; Yilmaz, Hanife Nuray; Garip, Hasan; Satilmis, Tulin; Kucukkeles, Nazan
    Objective: To analyze the treatment effects of corticotomy-assisted maxillary protraction with skeletal anchorage and Class III elastics in patients with Class III malocclusions. Materials and Methods: The study group consisted of 19 patients with a mean age of 13.12 +/- 1.28 years. Initially, patients were monitored for 5 months before treatment to evaluate growth changes. Changes during control, protraction and fixed orthodontic treatment periods were compared with the cephalometric radiographs taken initially, before protraction, after protraction, and after fixed orthodontic treatment. Treatment outcomes also were compared with the growth effects. Results: Sagittal measurements of maxilla showed significant improvements (3.59 +/- 1.32 mm) during the protraction period (3.85 +/- 1.12 months) whereas no significant changes were seen during the control period. Upper and lower incisor inclinations were increased, and the upper occlusal plane angle showed significant counterclockwise rotation during protraction. Significant soft-tissue changes also reflected the underlying skeletal changes. Maxillary advancement was stable during fixed orthodontic treatment. Conclusion: Compared with control period of the patients, this protocol produced significant improvements in skeletal and soft-tissue structures.
  • Publication
    Three-dimensional evaluation of surgically assisted asymmetric rapid maxillary expansion
    (MOSBY-ELSEVIER, 2019) UĞURLU, FAYSAL; Karabiber, Gulden; Yilmaz, Hanife Nuray; Nevzatoglu, Sirin; Ugurlu, Faysal; Akdogan, Tuna
    Introduction: Unilateral posterior crossbite is classified as true unilateral posterior crossbite (TUPC) or functional posterior crossbite (FPC). The differential diagnosis between TUPC and FPC is of utmost importance for the decision of expansion protocol because conventional expansion methods have some shortcomings for TUPC. The aim of this retrospective study was to 3-dimensionally evaluate the effects of asymmetric rapid maxillary expansion combined with unilateral osteotomy. Methods: This study sample comprised 16 patients (mean age 18.38 +/- 6 1.45) with TUPC. A Hyrax acrylic cap included the maxillary premolars and molars on the constricted side, and all teeth up to the central incisor were included on the other side to increase anchorage. Unilateral surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion was performed and included anterior (aperture piriformis), lateral (zygomatic buttress), and posterior (pterygomaxillary junction) osteotomies on the constricted side and separation of the midpalatal suture. Cone-beam computed tomographic scans taken just before the operation and after 6 months of retention were used to assess skeletal, dental, and periodontal changes. Results: Expansion was seen on both sides; however, the amount of expansion and tipping was higher on the osteotomy+ side. Because the canines were not included in the acrylic cap on the osteotomy+ side, they did not present the same amount of tipping as the ipsilateral posterior teeth. More teeth were affected periodontally on the osteotomy- side; however, there were no clinically significant differences between the osteotomy+ and osteotomy+ sides (mean differences range +10.54 to -0.57 mm). The aperture piriformis width increased significantly on the osteotomy+ side. Conclusions: The treatment mechanics had no clinically detrimental effects on the supporting alveolar bone of the maxilla on either side, and it was thought to be effective in cases with TUPC; however, case selection is crucial.
  • Publication
    Candida Albicans’ların Nazoalveoler şekillendirme (NAŞ) aygıtlarına yapışma sıklığı
    (2014-10-29) YILMAZ, HANİFE NURAY; CAN, BANU; KADİR, TANJU; NEVZATOĞLU Ş., YILMAZ H. N., CAN B., KADİR T.
  • PublicationOpen Access
    Comparison of the effects of rapid maxillary expansion and alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction protocols followed by facemask therapy
    (KOREAN ASSOC ORTHODONTISTS, 2019) ÖNEM ÖZBİLEN, ELVAN; Ozbilen, Elvan Onem; Yilmaz, Hanife Nuray; Kucukkeles, Nazan
    Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate and compare the changes in the pharyngeal airway (PA), maxillary sinus volume, and skeletal parameters after rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction (Alt-RAMEC) followed by facemask (FM) therapy. Methods: The records of 40 patients with skeletal Class lll malocclusion due to maxillary retrognathism were collected, and the patients were assigned into two groups. The first group comprised 8 male and 12 female patients (mean age, 10.0 +/- 1.1 years) treated using RME/FM for an average of 10 months. The second group comprised 10 male and 10 female patients (mean age, 9.64 +/- 1.3 years) treated using Alt-RAMEC/FM for an average of 12 months. Cone-beam computed tomography images acquired before (TO) and after treatment (T1) were evaluated. Results: Regarding the skeletal effects, significant differences between the groups were the increase in ANS-HRP (perpendicular distance of ANS to the horizontal reference plane, 0.99 mm, p <0.05) in the Alt-RAMEC/FM group and the decrease in PP-SN (palatal plane to Sella-Nasion plane, 0.93 degrees, p < 0.05) in the RME/FM group. Maxillary sinus volumes increased significantly in both the groups, and the increase was statistically significantly higher in the AltRAMEC/FM group. Although no significant intergroup differences were observed in PA volumes, both lower (1,011.19 mm(3)) and total (1,601.21 mm(3)), PA volume increased significantly in the Alt-RAMEC/FM group. Conclusions: The different expansion devices and protocols used with FM therapy do not seem to affect the forward movement of the maxilla and PA volumes. In contrast, the increase in maxillary sinus volume was greater in the Alt-RAMEC/FM protocol.