Publication:
Fracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate, Indirect Resin Composite and Zirconia By Using Dual Cure Resin Cements

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKAHRAMANOĞLU, ERKUT
dc.contributor.authorsBadwan, Mohammed; Kahramanoglu, Erkut
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-14T10:14:59Z
dc.date.available2022-03-14T10:14:59Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of the study was to examine the fracture resistance of lithium disilicate, indirect resin composite and zirconia by using dual cure resin cements. Methods: Three groups of 180 samples (n= 60) of E-max, zirconia and indirect resin composite materials (10mm diameter and 1 mm thickness). Discs were fabricated and cemented with three dual curing resin cements. Aging treatment was then applied to the discs by using thermal cycle machine (at 5 degrees C to 55 degrees C/dwell time: 20s), 10000 cycles for 168 hours' 7 days. Fracture tests were performed to the sample discs using piston on three balls test to determine the biaxial flexure strength of the 180 discs of the three materials. The results were analysed by using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t-test. Results: Statistically significant difference was found between control groups (before cementation and thermal cycle) and both group B (after cementation before thermal cycle) and group C (after cementation and thermal cycle) in all materials (P<0.05). Comparing Zirconia, Gradia and E-max all control groups showed statistically significant difference and Zirconia was showed greater flexural resistance against other materials. In addition, all materials also showed statistically significant difference in Variolink/Multilink cemented Group B and C. In Nexus cemented Group B and C statistically significant difference was found only Zirconia material. Similar to control group results, Zirconia material was showed greater flexural resistance values with both cements in Group B and C. Conclusion: There is a difference between flexural strength of the three materials, Zirconia has a better flexural strength when compared to lithium disilicate and indirect resin composite.
dc.identifier.doi10.33808/clinexphealthsci.797126
dc.identifier.issn2459-1459
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/244259
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000604683100017
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMARMARA UNIV, INST HEALTH SCIENCES
dc.relation.ispartofCLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectZirconia
dc.subjectlithium disilicate
dc.subjectindirect resin composite
dc.subjectfracture resistance
dc.subjectthermal cycle
dc.subjectFLEXURAL STRENGTH
dc.subjectTOUGHNESS
dc.subjectSURFACE
dc.subjectTHICKNESS
dc.subjectSTABILITY
dc.subjectHARDNESS
dc.subjectSHADE
dc.subjectCOLOR
dc.titleFracture Resistance of Lithium Disilicate, Indirect Resin Composite and Zirconia By Using Dual Cure Resin Cements
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.avesis.id5d89eb2e-0bd8-49f3-b185-63fd1c4cbe13
local.import.packageSS16
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atTRDIZIN
local.journal.numberofpages8
oaire.citation.endPage442
oaire.citation.issue4
oaire.citation.startPage435
oaire.citation.titleCLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES
oaire.citation.volume10
relation.isAuthorOfPublication908a4cbc-b697-4e95-9a68-bc40accc8153
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery908a4cbc-b697-4e95-9a68-bc40accc8153

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Badwan and Kahramanoğlu - 2020 - FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF LITHIUM DI SILICATE, INDIRE.pdf
Size:
733.69 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Research Outputs