Publication:
Automatic thoughts, cognitive distortions, dysfunctional attitudes, core beliefs, and ruminative response styles in unipolar major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder: a comparative study

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorYILDIZ, MESUT
dc.contributor.authorsYesilyaprak, Nurgul; Batmaz, Sedat; Yildiz, Mesut; Songur, Emrah; Akpinar Aslan, Esma
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-14T09:18:11Z
dc.date.available2022-03-14T09:18:11Z
dc.date.issued2019-10-02
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare patients with bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder, who were either in an acute depressive episode or in remission, and a healthy control group on their cognitions related to depression and mania/hypomania, and on their response styles. METHODS: A total of 300 participants who presented to our outpatient psychiatry department were included in the study (100 participants with unipolar depression (DG), 100 with bipolar disorder, and 100 with no previous or current psychiatric disorder (CG)). The participants completed the Cognition Checklist (CCL), the Cognition Checklist for Mania (CCL-M-R), the Cognitive Distortions Questionnaire (CDQ), the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (DAS), the Hypomanic Attitudes and Positive Predictions Inventory (HAPPI), the Brief Core Schemas Scale (BCSS), Ruminative Response Scale (RRS), and the Responses to Positive Affect Questionnaire (RPAQ). The groups were compared with each other by one-way analysis of variance, independent samples t-test, and chi-square tests. RESULTS: The DG scored higher than the other groups on the CCL, the frequency and intensity subscales of the CDQ, the DAS, and the negative-self and negative-others subscales of the BCSS, the RRS, and on the dampening subscale of the RPAQ. The clinical groups scored higher than the CG on the scores of the relationships subscale of the CCL-M-R, the total score of the CDQ, and the HAPPI. The CG scored higher than the clinical groups on the positive-self subscale of the BCSS, and on the emotion focused positive rumination subscale. CONCLUSIONS: These findings are important in the differential diagnosis of mood disorders, and for their treatment with cognitive behavioural psychotherapy.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/24750573.2019.1690815
dc.identifier.eissn2475-0581
dc.identifier.issn2475-0573
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/242938
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000497024900001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherTAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
dc.relation.ispartofPSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAutomatic thought
dc.subjectbelief
dc.subjectbipolar disorder
dc.subjectcognitive distortion
dc.subjectdepression
dc.subjectrumination
dc.subjectTURKISH VERSION
dc.subjectPSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES
dc.subjectPOSITIVE AFFECT
dc.subjectHYPOMANIC ATTITUDES
dc.subjectRATING-SCALE
dc.subjectBRIEF-HAPPI
dc.subjectRELIABILITY
dc.subjectVALIDITY
dc.subjectINDIVIDUALS
dc.subjectMANIA
dc.titleAutomatic thoughts, cognitive distortions, dysfunctional attitudes, core beliefs, and ruminative response styles in unipolar major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder: a comparative study
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.avesis.id770ef529-25df-43be-ae73-26277e36f062
local.import.packageSS16
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atSCOPUS
local.journal.numberofpages10
local.journal.quartileQ4
oaire.citation.endPage863
oaire.citation.issue4
oaire.citation.startPage854
oaire.citation.titlePSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
oaire.citation.volume29
relation.isAuthorOfPublication65166b6b-3dc1-4af5-bc24-41b7544cfa52
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery65166b6b-3dc1-4af5-bc24-41b7544cfa52

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Yesilyaprak et al. - 2019 - Automatic thoughts, cognitive distortions, dysfunc.pdf
Size:
1.67 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Research Outputs