Publication: Psychometric properties of the facial disability index in patients with facial palsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Loading...
Files
Date
2022-07-01
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Purpose The aim of the study was to present the systematic review and meta-analysis of the psychometrical analysis of
Facial Disability Index (FDI) studies.
Methods A literature search was conducted in the relevant electronic databases “PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science (WoS),
and Cochrane Library.” A total of 621 articles were obtained by searching the relevant keywords (PubMed: 384, Cochrane
Library: 14, Web of Science: 132, Scopus: 91). A total of 8 papers were included. The four-point classifcation and ratingbased “COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN)” tools were used to
evaluate the bias risk and evidence levels.
Results Cronbach’s alpha pooling of FDI total score was (ES): 0.803 (95% CI: 0.73–0.86). Heterogeneity for the Facial Disability Index-Physical Function (FDI-PF) and Facial Disability Index-Social Function (FDI-SF) subscore based on intraclass
correlation coefcient (ICC) were I
2=84.2% (ICC: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.81–0.92) and I
2=73.7% (ICC: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.81–0.90),
respectively. Correlational results between Sunnybrook Facial Grading System (SFGS) with FDI-PF and FDI-SF were 0.38
and 0.22, respectively. The correlations of FDI-PF with Short Form-12 Physical Component Summary (SF-12-PCS) and
Short Form-12 Mental Health Component Summary (SF-12-MCS) were 0.43 and 0.28, respectively. Correlation results of
FDI-SF with SF-12-PCS and SF-12-MCS were 0.23 and 0.57. The relationship results of Facial Clinimetric Evaluation with
FDI-PF and FDI-SF were 0.71 and 0.57, respectively.
Conclusion FDI is a psychometrically valuable questionnaire, especially for the internal consistency, reliability, and validity.
In clinical practice, the use of FDI would be valuable, in addition to clinician-based grading, to see more of patients’ social
infuences precisely.
Description
Keywords
Tıp, Sağlık Bilimleri, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri, Nöroloji, Yaşam Bilimleri, Temel Bilimler, Medicine, Health Sciences, Internal Medicine Sciences, Neurology, Life Sciences, Natural Sciences, KLİNİK NÖROLOJİ, Klinik Tıp, Klinik Tıp (MED), SİNİR BİLİMİ, Sinirbilim ve Davranış, Yaşam Bilimleri (LIFE), CLINICAL NEUROLOGY, CLINICAL MEDICINE, Clinical Medicine (MED), NEUROSCIENCES, NEUROSCIENCE & BEHAVIOR, Life Sciences (LIFE), Developmental Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, General Neuroscience, Neuroscience (miscellaneous), Sensory Systems, Human-Computer Interaction, Neurology (clinical), Physical Sciences, Bell's palsy, Facial disability, FDI, reliability, Responsiveness, Validity, QUALITY-OF-LIFE, RELIABILITY, VALIDATION, RECOVERY, CRITERIA, VERSION, NERVE, MOTOR, FDI, Bell’s palsy, Bell’s palsy, Facial disability, FDI, reliability, Responsiveness, Validity
Citation
ÖZDEN F., Tumturk I., SARI Z., "Psychometric properties of the Facial Disability Index in patients with facial palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis", NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, cilt.43, sa.7, ss.4157-4165, 2022