Publication: Comparison of second-line treatment outcomes between sensitive and refractory small cell lung cancer patients: a retrospective analysis
dc.contributor.author | YUMUK, PERRAN FULDEN | |
dc.contributor.authors | Korkmaz, T.; Seber, S.; Kefeli, U.; Sari, E.; Canhoroz, M.; Oven, B.; Yildirim, E.; Yasar, N.; Aydin, D.; Balvan, O.; Sener, N.; Yuksel, S.; Mert, A.; Polat, O.; Yumuk, F.; Kanat, O.; Gumus, M.; Turhal, N. S. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-12T18:10:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-12T18:10:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.description.abstract | Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has a high relapse rate despite being very chemosensitive. The efficacy of second-line treatment is dismal. Our aim was to evaluate the outcome of second-line treatment. We retrospectively assessed data of 120 SCLC patients who failed first-line treatment and received second-line treatment at three medical oncology centers. Median age of group was 58. 82 % had an ECOG PS of 0-1 at the time of relapse. 39 % were at limited stage (LS) at the time of diagnosis. Patients who progressed more than 3 months after first-line therapy were categorized as having platinum-sensitive disease (PSD) (64 %). The number of patients who received platin-based combination treatment was 33 (27 %). The median OS time starting from the initiation of second-line treatment was 7 months. Multivariate analysis identified PS (p = 0.006), extent of disease at diagnosis (0.014) and PSD (0.001) as the independent prognostic factors for survival. Subgroup analyses of the patients with PSD indicated platin rechallenge yields higher progression-free survival, overall survival and overall response rate. Patients with good ECOG PS,who have PSD or initially presenting with LS, have a good prognosis and in patients with PSD, platinum-based therapy would be more appropriate. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s12094-012-0960-6 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1699-3055 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1699-048X | |
dc.identifier.pubmed | 23143955 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11424/231415 | |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000321112900005 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG | |
dc.relation.ispartof | CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
dc.subject | Platinum sensitive disease | |
dc.subject | Platinum refracter disease | |
dc.subject | Second-line chemotherapy | |
dc.subject | Small cell lung cancer | |
dc.subject | PHASE-II | |
dc.subject | TOPOTECAN | |
dc.subject | CHEMOTHERAPY | |
dc.subject | ETOPOSIDE | |
dc.subject | CISPLATIN | |
dc.subject | PROGRESS | |
dc.subject | THERAPY | |
dc.subject | TRIAL | |
dc.subject | CARE | |
dc.title | Comparison of second-line treatment outcomes between sensitive and refractory small cell lung cancer patients: a retrospective analysis | |
dc.type | article | |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
local.avesis.id | 5d56018f-2428-46e7-a0ff-b0fadf7d8cff | |
local.import.package | SS17 | |
local.indexed.at | WOS | |
local.indexed.at | SCOPUS | |
local.journal.numberofpages | 6 | |
oaire.citation.endPage | 540 | |
oaire.citation.issue | 7 | |
oaire.citation.startPage | 535 | |
oaire.citation.title | CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY | |
oaire.citation.volume | 15 | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 4e7b3d69-6d73-4c60-89e4-d6fddfddd2aa | |
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 4e7b3d69-6d73-4c60-89e4-d6fddfddd2aa |