Publication:
Etiology and the impact of refractory peritonitis on clinical outcomes of patients on peritoneal dialysis-12 years' single-center experience from Turkey

dc.contributor.authorTUĞCU, MURAT
dc.contributor.authorBARUTÇU ATAŞ, DİLEK
dc.contributor.authorARIKAN, İZZET HAKKI
dc.contributor.authorVELİOĞLU, ARZU
dc.contributor.authorAŞICIOĞLU, EBRU
dc.contributor.authorsMentese I. B., Atas D., Arikan I. H., Tugcu M., Velioglu A., Asicioglu E.
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-25T10:47:16Z
dc.date.available2023-07-25T10:47:16Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-01
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND AIMS: The outcomes of refractory peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients have been reported to be inferior to those of solitary peritonitis. The current study aimed to examine the factors associated with treatment failure in PD patients experiencing refractory peritonitis. METHOD: This single-center retrospective study included all episodes of refractory peritonitis in adult PD patients in Marmara University Hospital, Turkey, between 2009 and 2020. Patient characteristics, microbiological data, outcomes and factors associated with refractory peritonitis were analysed. The primary outcome was peritonitis-related catheter loss. Secondary outcomes were hospitalization and peritonitis-related death. RESULTS: Overall, 236 episodes of refractory peritonitis occurring in 135 patients were included. Gram-positive, gram-negative and fungal infections accounted for 44.1%, 20.4% and 2.4% of all peritonitis episodes, respectively. Forty-seven patients (34.8%) needed catheter removal, 2 patients (1.5%) died due to peritonitis complications and 59 episodes (25%) needed hospitalization. Mean fifth day PD fluid cell count was significantly greater among patients who required PD catheter removal (3621.3 ± 3144.1 versus 1589.4 ± 2316.6 P < 0.001). Furthermore, patients with >1000/mm3 cell count on the fifth day had higher rate of catheter removal (72.3% versus 37.6%, P < 0.001) as compared to patients with cell count und 00/mm3. Treatment failure was more common in peritonitis episodes caused by gram (−) organisms (31.9% versus 14.8%, P:0.012). Pseudomonas and fungi-associated peritonitis were also significantly correlated with catheter loss (P:0.001 and P: <0.001) (Table 1). When peritonitis episodes with more and <1000 cells/mm3 on the fifth day were compared, there were more episodes with gram (−) bacteria (29.7% versus 12.9%, P:0.003) and hospitalization (41.9% versus 11.4%, P: <0.001) in the group with more than 1000 cells/mm3. In the multivariate analysis, factors associated with catheter loss were a cell count of >1000 on the fifth day and hospitalization, while presence of gram (+) bacteria related peritonitis was inversely correlated with catheter loss (Table 2). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that the PD cell count on the fifth day of peritonitis can be used as a prognostic tool to determine the prognosis of refractory peritonitis episodes. Although we were unable to show the adverse prognostic effect of gram (−) bacteria related peritonitis, gram (+) bacteria related peritonitis was associated with better outcome. Prospective studies are needed to assess the risk factors for adverse outcomes of patients with refractory peritonitis, as the evidence in this area is sparse.
dc.identifier.citationMentese I. B., Atas D., Arikan I. H., Tugcu M., Velioglu A., Asicioglu E., "ETIOLOGY AND THE IMPACT OF REFRACTORY PERITONITIS ON CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF PATIENTS ON PERITONEAL DIALYSIS-12 YEARS' SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE FROM TURKEY", NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, cilt.37, 2022
dc.identifier.issn0931-0509
dc.identifier.urihttps://watermark.silverchair.com/gfac078_039.pdf?token=AQECAHi208BE49Ooan9kkhW_Ercy7Dm3ZL_9Cf3qfKAc485ysgAAA4EwggN9BgkqhkiG9w0BBwagggNuMIIDagIBADCCA2MGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAeBglghkgBZQMEAS4wEQQMEUTHaVtoVCDFSNFoAgEQgIIDNOvlqzAA2gKoSOKpw5BoHMrWLD5dzoSjCzeAmlnSAzUD0wSQD2UHpibVkYV8QkNTOLvfkNqcqgfAqD9-8snsDFsqUnr5rhp5Izc_IC_ec4fwJdDdoPZnu9u7fCjnNMJtqIxpqj26oaLcLTN_YbcEAWu8D_dOf2iqvIm9eDcPxNRcN9GV3f5hLs7QR5wK4OB9SfwLPwr_MbPUJiBAAU-sHHHAKvRUgghsqjq_QJABA79AqqC_uopWsfotpT6nwEj_2YTXejI0dUkvEhlvLsJs4NTu8GOLSKpkEWBzGOEgHugBr5xaI21zcNA4WtjCkqXvkNsTwZnQlDhUJZVpht31r7-x09goS4jKyxqNl_GUmOmighz8ZjVjJk-SjIEJ2OBuzh0nnEDnmbwkuI5aLczh1b2se7x9WJbq9RKfeAvSnUpc3zt8G7R4Uu46P-D0veORWTQSo7HzUa7qz7kezFzQJgIgcUmQ5OtmiC1vOAZ2e7-68ep4zwSPuJVdJqGzFlPWCFUhbT06RGyM10VBvIZUSlDkmv4EHmeYSj1Pc1ymFHGB0i9KU3ZobpzvSp88bQgLThS40YGcPY1cp5PJ3eb13o48hthRgPz2gyuJ3eWfJfopGZcemvWd8--SSwnvW4uTTf7xhp0-tY3ZrKEoeiHVahszqVNizPO7wYs7mgoNj9uJy_agKXbMkXti7kR50TDYoZOGzuzEojkxOslgDS6Of6q5Q2YycrIKesidI8TN88pXQD4bNC_ujWIHpL9K51rjW2wjL5WBaaXe1uv7m6nJowsjUUm9DVLp6UPPtS0Kgc1htpWYoKk2y4_CBufOLYlfqO00m0BQm89qiaE6oYCmBj4XrL5Bbqu4il6Mvh4v6icz7Ls8qZ05Cu1nbpTYOaqvgnSep7iF-uFOQDJQXhbvUDEEco3j5sueuDvCLQcdxdkG13dzzgHwIrjFFgAOupENs-BcZsvvJR0nj60Bml_oHTAeMoYXtIIM0ZVjnPEP_TC5A_uDNa3dZSs1a5LPt50hPCPHr6U1zxh75PNDrPTRHQHBsrfuR0v7yVaZ3clIwx42WCPtTyi__ruRiTINHh_zN905Ad4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/291596
dc.identifier.volume37
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofNEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectİç Hastalıkları
dc.subjectNefroloji
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectHealth Sciences
dc.subjectInternal Medicine Sciences
dc.subjectInternal Diseases
dc.subjectNephrology
dc.subjectTRANSPLANTASYON
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectÜROLOJİ VE NEFROLOJİ
dc.subjectTRANSPLANTATION
dc.subjectCLINICAL MEDICINE
dc.subjectClinical Medicine (MED)
dc.subjectUROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
dc.subjectÜroloji
dc.subjectTransplantasyon
dc.subjectUrology
dc.subjectTransplantation
dc.titleEtiology and the impact of refractory peritonitis on clinical outcomes of patients on peritoneal dialysis-12 years' single-center experience from Turkey
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.avesis.idc4110af0-984b-4e78-b2e6-0fe8b26b644a
local.indexed.atWOS
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationafd936cf-9aca-4324-85da-41283a9ec64c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication82d26249-dbb5-40e4-962b-63e5334031a5
relation.isAuthorOfPublication1fe3028b-011e-403a-ac08-1932d177a065
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa7410f0e-0eb4-4b83-ad61-a71dfbee164f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8d7fe885-fe9a-4e61-a77c-587df4c2adbe
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryafd936cf-9aca-4324-85da-41283a9ec64c

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
39.pdf
Size:
107.43 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections