Publication:
Soft tissue evaluation after maxillary protraction with RPE or with the ALT-RAMEC protocol A controlled 3D study

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorÖNEM ÖZBİLEN, ELVAN
dc.contributor.authorYILMAZ, HANİFE NURAY
dc.contributor.authorsÖNEM ÖZBİLEN E., Ari M. O. , YILMAZ H. N. , Biren S.
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-17T13:08:50Z
dc.date.available2022-10-17T13:08:50Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose To evaluate soft tissue changes following maxillary protraction with different expansion protocols using three-dimensional (3D) stereophotogrammetry. Methods Pretreatment (T0) and postprotraction (T1) stereophotogrammetry and lateral cephalometric images of skeletal class III patients were included in this retrospective study. In all, 32 patients were treated either with a combination of rapid palatal expansion and facemask (RPE/FM; n = 16; mean age: 9.94 +/- 0.68 years) or with alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction together with a facemask (Alt-RAMEC/FM; n = 16; mean age: 9.74 +/- 1.35 years). As a control group 16 untreated patients were recruited (mean age: 9.46 +/- 0.8 years). For superimpositioning of the 3D images taken at T0 and T1, the face was divided into defined regions and 3D and differences between the groups were evaluated using 3-matic software (Materialise Europe, Leuven, Belgium). Cephalometric analyses were also performed. Results While the increases in the cephalometric parameters SNA and ANB were significantly greater in the treatment groups, the value for SNB also increased in the control group (p < 0.05). The results of the stereophotogrammetry analyses demonstrated that the mean changes in the RPE/FM and in the Alt-RAMEC/FM groups were significantly different for the midface compared to the control group (0.33 +/- 0.26 mm, 0.3 +/- 0.31 mm, 0.1 +/- 0.18 mm). The maximum positive, negative, and mean changes were also significantly different between the treatment and control groups for the upper lip (p < 0.05). For the lower lip and the chin significant backward movements in the RPE/FM as well as in the Alt-RAMEC/FM group (-1.06 +/- 1.26 mm, -0.68 +/- 0.45 mm) were observed, while the control group (0.09 +/- 0.53 mm) presented changes in the opposite direction. Regarding soft tissue changes, no significant differences were found between the RPE/FM and Alt-RAMEC/FM groups. Conclusion Both treatment protocols improved the soft tissue profile due to a forward movement of the midface and the upper lip, and a backward movement of the lower lip and chin, compared to the control group.
dc.identifier.citationÖNEM ÖZBİLEN E., Ari M. O. , YILMAZ H. N. , Biren S., "Soft tissue evaluation after maxillary protraction with RPE or with the ALT-RAMEC protocol A controlled 3D study", JOURNAL OF OROFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS-FORTSCHRITTE DER KIEFERORTHOPADIE, 2022
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00056-022-00428-0
dc.identifier.issn1434-5293
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/282383
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF OROFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS-FORTSCHRITTE DER KIEFERORTHOPADIE
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectDiş Hekimliği
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subjectDentistry
dc.subjectHealth Sciences
dc.subjectDİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ, ORAL CERRAHİ VE TIP
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectDENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
dc.subjectCLINICAL MEDICINE
dc.subjectClinical Medicine (MED)
dc.subjectPeriodontoloji
dc.subjectOrtodonti
dc.subjectAğız Cerrahisi
dc.subjectDiş Hijyeni
dc.subjectDişçilik Hizmetleri
dc.subjectDiş Hekimliği (çeşitli)
dc.subjectPeriodontics
dc.subjectOrthodontics
dc.subjectOral Surgery
dc.subjectDental Hygiene
dc.subjectDental Assisting
dc.subjectDentistry (miscellaneous)
dc.subjectGeneral Dentistry
dc.subjectAlternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction
dc.subjectFacemask
dc.subjectRapid palatal expansion
dc.subjectFacial esthetics
dc.subject3D stereophotogrammetry
dc.subjectCLASS-III MALOCCLUSION
dc.subjectPROFILE CHANGES
dc.subjectORTHOPEDIC TREATMENT
dc.subjectFACIAL MORPHOLOGY
dc.subjectEXPANSION
dc.subjectSKELETAL
dc.subjectRELIABILITY
dc.subjectFACEMASK
dc.subjectSTEREOPHOTOGRAMMETRY
dc.subjectREPRODUCIBILITY
dc.subjectAlternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction · Facemask · Rapid palatal expansion · Facial esthetics · 3D stereophotogrammetry
dc.titleSoft tissue evaluation after maxillary protraction with RPE or with the ALT-RAMEC protocol A controlled 3D study
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
local.avesis.ida11dc025-0252-44ba-87f5-48c4abcb981d
local.indexed.atWOS
local.indexed.atPUBMED
local.indexed.atSCOPUS
relation.isAuthorOfPublication62607ecf-1649-4144-a352-b260a643af54
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf585731a-f1be-4c8f-8084-775ecb485e33
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery62607ecf-1649-4144-a352-b260a643af54

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
9.pdf
Size:
770.61 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Research Outputs