Person:
KARADAĞ SAYGI, NAİME EVRİM

Loading...
Profile Picture

Email Address

Birth Date

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Organizational Unit

Job Title

Last Name

KARADAĞ SAYGI

First Name

NAİME EVRİM

Name

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • PublicationOpen Access
    Pediatric dysphagia overview: best practice recommendation study by multidisciplinary experts
    (2022-11-01) KARADAĞ SAYGI, NAİME EVRİM; KARADAĞ, BÜLENT TANER; DURMUŞ KOCAASLAN, FATMA NİHAL; TUTAR, ENGİN; Umay E., Eyigör S., Giray E., Saygi E. K., Karadağ B. T., Kocaaslan N. D., Yuksel D., Demir A. M., Tutar E., Tıkız C., et al.
    Background Currently, there is no comprehensive and multidisciplinary recommendation study covering all aspects of pediatric dysphagia (PD). This study aimed to generate PD management recommendations with methods that can be used in clinical practice to fill this gap in our country and in the world, from the perspective of experienced multidisciplinary experts. Methods This recommendation paper was generated by a multidisciplinary team, using the seven-step process and a three-round modified Delphi survey via e-mail. First, ten open-ended questions were created, and then detailed recommendations including management, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up were created with the answers from these questions. Each recommendation item was voted on by the experts as overall consensus (strong recommendation), approaching consensus (weak recommendation) and divergent consensus (not recommended). Results In the 1st Delphi round, a questionnaire of 414 items was prepared based on the experts\" responses to ten open-ended questions. In the 2nd Delphi round, 59.2% of these items were accepted as pre-recommendation. In the 3rd Delphi round, 62.6% of 246 items were accepted for inclusion in the proposals. The final version recommendations consisted of 154 items. Conclusions This study includes comprehensive and detailed answers for every problem that could be posed in clinical practice for the management of PD, and recommendations are for all pediatric patients with both oropharyngeal and esophageal dysphagia.
  • PublicationOpen Access
    Does ultrasound imaging of the spastic muscle have an additive effect on clinical examination tools in patients with cerebral palsy?: A pilot study
    (2022-01-01) AKBAŞ, FIRAT; YAĞCI, İLKER; AKGÜLLE, AHMET HAMDİ; KARADAĞ SAYGI, NAİME EVRİM; Atalay K. G., Saygi E. K., AKBAŞ F., Coskun O. K., AKGÜLLE A. H., YAĞCI İ.
    OBJECTIVE: The Modified Ashworth Scale, the Modified Tardieu Scale, and measuring the passive range of motion is commonly preferred examination tools for spasticity in cerebral palsy (CP). Ultrasonography has become increasingly used to provide relevant insight into spastic muscle morphology and structure recently. It was aimed to reveal associations between the clinical and ultrasonographic parameters of gastrocnemius medialis (GM) and lateralis muscles in this population. METHODS: Thirty-four children with spastic CP aged between 4 and 12 years who did not have botulinum neurotoxin A intervention within 6 months or had no previous history of any orthopedic or neurological surgery were included. The spasticity of GM and lateralis was evaluated firstly by the Modified Ashworth Scale, Modified Tardieu Scale, and ankle passive range of motion. Then, the cross-sectional area (CSA), muscle thickness (MT), qualitative and quantitative echo intensity (EI) values of both muscles were measured from their ultrasonographic images. RESULTS: The CSA of GM, and qualitative EI of both muscles were found to be mild-to-moderately correlated to all clinical examination tools (p<0.01), whereas the CSA of gastrocnemius lateralis was mildly related to Modified Ashworth Scale (p=0.009). The MT and quantitative EI of both muscles were not associated with any of the clinical tools (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Ultrasonographic measurements of GM and lateralis partially reflect ankle spasticity in children with CP. Ultrasonography can be used as an alternative tool in this patient population where the clinical evaluation can not perform ideally.