Publication: XELOX Plus Bevacizumab vs. FOLFIRI Plus Bevacizumab Treatment for First-line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Colon Cancer: a Retrospective Study of the Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology
| dc.contributor.authors | Duran, Ayse Ocak; Karaca, Halit; Besiroglu, Mehmet; Bayoglu, Ibrahim Vedat; Menekse, Serkan; Yapici, Heves Surmeli; Yazilitas, Dogan; Bahceci, Aykut; Uysal, Mukremin; Sevinc, Alper; Hacibekiroglu, Ilhan; Aksoy, Asude; Tanriverdi, Ozgur; Arpaci, Erkan; Inanc, Mevlude; Dane, Faysal; Ozkan, Metin | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-14T11:01:27Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-11T08:52:30Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-03-14T11:01:27Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015-01-06 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background: XELOX plus bevacizumab (XELOX-Bev) and FOLFIRI plus Bevacizumab (FOLFIRI - Bev) treatments are an effective strategies patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The aim of this study was to compare efficacy of first-line XELOX-Bev treatment vs FOLFIRI-Bev treatment for mCRC. Materials and Methods: A total of 409 patients with mCRC who received chemotherapy were included and divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (n=298) received XELOX-Bev and Group 2 (n=111) FOLFIRI-Bev. Comparisons were made in terms of overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival, response rate (RR), and grade 3-4 toxicity. Results: Median follow-up was 11 months in Group 1 and 15 months for Group 2. Complete remission was observed in 29 (9.7%) and 2 (1.8%) patients, partial remission in 139 (46.6%) and 27 (24.5%), stable disease in 88 (29.5%) and 49 (44.1%) and progressive disease in 42 (14.1%) and 33 (30.0%) patients in Group 1 and 2, respectively. Median OS was 25 months (range 2-57 months, 95% CI; 22.2-27.7) for Group 1 and 20 months (range 1-67 months, 95% CI; 16.8-23.1) for Group 2 (p=0.036). Median PFS was 9.6 months (range 2-36 months, 95% CI; 8.8-10.4) for Group 1 and 9 months (range 1-44 months, 95% CI; 7.4-10.5) for Group 2 (p=0.019). Objective RR was 56.4% in Group 1 and 26.1% in Group 2 (p<0.001). Conclusions: First-line XELOX-Bev is more effective with a better response rate, prolongation of median PFS/OS, and a superior safety profile compared with FOLFIRI-Bev. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.23.10375 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1513-7368 | |
| dc.identifier.pubmed | 25556478 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11424/245744 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000351058400056 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | ASIAN PACIFIC ORGANIZATION CANCER PREVENTION | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.subject | Metastatic colorectal cancer | |
| dc.subject | XELOX plus bevacizumab | |
| dc.subject | FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab | |
| dc.subject | comparison | |
| dc.subject | ADVANCED COLORECTAL-CANCER | |
| dc.subject | SINGLE-AGENT BEVACIZUMAB | |
| dc.subject | CELL LUNG-CANCER | |
| dc.subject | PHASE-III | |
| dc.subject | MAINTENANCE THERAPY | |
| dc.subject | ELDERLY-PATIENTS | |
| dc.subject | CHINESE PATIENTS | |
| dc.subject | EFFICACY | |
| dc.subject | SAFETY | |
| dc.subject | CAPECITABINE | |
| dc.title | XELOX Plus Bevacizumab vs. FOLFIRI Plus Bevacizumab Treatment for First-line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Colon Cancer: a Retrospective Study of the Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology | |
| dc.type | article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| oaire.citation.endPage | 10379 | |
| oaire.citation.issue | 23 | |
| oaire.citation.startPage | 10375 | |
| oaire.citation.title | ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION | |
| oaire.citation.volume | 15 |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
