Publication:
Comparison of Apical Extrusion of Sodium Hypochlorite Using 4 Different Root Canal Irrigation Techniques

dc.contributor.authorTARÇIN, BİLGE
dc.contributor.authorTÜRKAYDIN, DİLEK
dc.contributor.authorİRİBOZ, EMRE
dc.contributor.authorsIriboz, Emre; Bayraktar, Koral; Turkaydin, Dilek; Tarcin, Bilge
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-13T12:48:10Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T07:58:54Z
dc.date.available2022-03-13T12:48:10Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: We compared the apical extrusion of sodium hypochlorite delivered with a 27-G needle, self-adjusting file (SAF), passive ultrasonic irrigation, or the Endo Vac system (SybronEndo, Orange, CA) during the instrumentation and final irrigation of root canals. Methods: Matched paired single-canal teeth were divided into 8 groups. The experimental groups were needle irrigation size #30 (NI30) and #50 (NI50), SAF size #30 (SAF30) and #50 (SAF50), passive ultrasonic irrigation size #30 (PUI30) and #50 (PUI50), and Endo Vac size #30 (EV30) and #50 (EV50). Teeth were embedded in 0.2% agarose gel (pH = 7.4) containing 1 mL 0.1% m-Cresol purple (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO), which changes color at a pH level of 9.0. Root canals were irrigated with sodium hypochlorite and EDTA using 4 different techniques, and the amount of irrigant was controlled. Standardized digital photographs were taken 20 minutes after the first irrigant was used and were analyzed to determine the amount of extrusion (expressed as a percentage of total pixels). Results: The amounts of apical extrusion obtained in the NI30, NI50, SAF30, SAF50, PUI30, PUI50, EV30, and EV50 groups were 30% (3/10), 50% (5/10), 20% (2/10), 70% (7/10), 40% (4/10), 40% (4/10), 10% (1/10), and 10% (1/10), respectively. The overall extrusion frequency, regardless of the apical preparation size, was 40% (8/20) for needle, 45% (9/20) for SAF, 40% (8/20) for ultrasonic irrigation, and 10% (2/20) for Endo Vac. Although the SAF group showed more extrusion, the percentage of pixels was significantly higher in the needle irrigation group (P<.01). The Endo Vac group showed significantly lower extrusion values than the other techniques in terms of the number of teeth and pixels (P < .05 and P < .01, respectively). Conclusions: The risk of apical extrusion is significantly lower with the Endo Vac in comparison with the 3 other techniques.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joen.2014.11.003
dc.identifier.eissn1878-3554
dc.identifier.issn0099-2399
dc.identifier.pubmed25492488
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/238172
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000353316400013
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectApical extrusion
dc.subjectEndoVac
dc.subjectirrigation
dc.subjectpassive ultrasonic irrigation
dc.subjectself-adjusting file
dc.subjectWORKING LENGTH
dc.subjectINSTRUMENTATION
dc.subjectEFFICACY
dc.subjectREMOVAL
dc.subjectSYSTEM
dc.subjectDEBRIS
dc.titleComparison of Apical Extrusion of Sodium Hypochlorite Using 4 Different Root Canal Irrigation Techniques
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage384
oaire.citation.issue3
oaire.citation.startPage380
oaire.citation.titleJOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
oaire.citation.volume41

Files