Publication:
Salivary sialic acid, protein, salivary flow rate, pH, buffering capacity and caries indices in subjects with Down's syndrome

dc.contributor.authorYARAT, AYŞEN
dc.contributor.authorAKYÜZ, SERAP HATİCE
dc.contributor.authorsYarat, A.; Akyüz, S.; Koç, L.; Erdem, H.; Emekli, N.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-15T11:10:31Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T10:34:19Z
dc.date.available2022-03-15T11:10:31Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare salivary sialic acid, protein, salivary flow rate, pH and buffering capacity and caries indices between subjects with Down's Syndrome and healthy controls. METHODS: Unstimulated mixed saliva was collected from 26 Down's syndrome subjects and 25 healthy subjects of age range 6-24 years. Total protein was determined by the method of Lowry and total sialic acid using Ehrlich reagent. Laemmli SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was also carried out. RESULTS: Buffering capacity and pH were quite similar for both groups. For permanent dentition subjects pH was significantly higher (P = 0.03) in the Down's syndrome group. The salivary flow rate of the Down's syndrome subjects was significantly lower (P < 0.01) than that of healthy controls and the Down's syndrome subjects' salivary protein and sialic acid levels were significantly higher (P < 0.001). The ratios of total sialic acid to total protein were significantly higher (P < 0.001) in the Down's syndrome group. However, salivary sialic acid expectoration rates, a means of compensating for flow rate differences, were significantly lower (P = 0.01) in the Down's syndrome subjects than in controls. Electrophoresis revealed no significant differences between the protein bands of the groups. There were no significant differences in caries indices between groups, even when compensated for age, nor in the salivary parameters within groups between sexes. CONCLUSIONS: Total salivary sialic acid in Down's syndrome subjects, higher in terms of levels but lower in terms of expectoration rates, was significantly different from that of controls of similar caries indices.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/s0300-5712(98)00030-x
dc.identifier.issn0300-5712
dc.identifier.pubmedPMID: 10071468
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/248709
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Dentistry
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectChild
dc.subjectDown Syndrome
dc.subjectHydrogen-Ion Concentration
dc.subjectSaliva
dc.subjectAge Factors
dc.subjectDMF Index
dc.subjectN-Acetylneuraminic Acid
dc.subjectElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel
dc.subjectSex Factors
dc.subjectBuffers
dc.subjectSalivary Proteins and Peptides
dc.subjectSecretory Rate
dc.subjectSodium Dodecyl Sulfate
dc.subjectSurface-Active Agents
dc.titleSalivary sialic acid, protein, salivary flow rate, pH, buffering capacity and caries indices in subjects with Down's syndrome
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage118
oaire.citation.startPage115
oaire.citation.titleJournal of Dentistry
oaire.citation.volume2

Files