Publication:
False positive PET scan deserves attention

dc.contributor.authorsAkgul, Asli Gul; Liman, Serife Tuba; Topcu, Salih; Yuksel, Mustafa
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-13T12:45:06Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-10T20:24:02Z
dc.date.available2022-03-13T12:45:06Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Pulmonary focal lesions are frequently identified incidentally. Furthermore, a final diagnosis is really a considerable problem for patients having risk factors for malignancy or particularly for a newly detected nodule during the postoperative period after any kind of lung surgery. For treatment decisions, the nature of the lesions needs to be clarified. Relatively recently positron emission tomography (PET) scan has been introduced as a non-invasive imaging method for the diagnosis of lesions on the basis of metabolic activity. Methods: In this study 19 cases with false-positive nodules on PET scan are presented. Chest x-rays and thoracic computed tomographies (CT) were performed to all patients. Due to abnormal/suspicious lesions on radiologic imagies, PET scan was performed to these patients and high standard uptake values (SUV) above the cut-off value of 2.5 were suggestive of malignancy. Invasive procedures were performed to the patients with high suspicion of malignancy. Results: Histology of the resected lesions showed that all of them were benign and therefore the PET results were false-positive. The final diagnoses were tuberculosis, aspergilloma, bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia (BOOP), sarcoidosis, sequestration, anthracosis and hamartoma. Conclusion: Patients living especially in countries with a high incidence of granulomatous diseases like tuberculosis, or patients in postoperative periods with high SUV should be studied thoroughly for false-positive PET results.
dc.identifier.doidoiWOS:000342963300037
dc.identifier.eissn2241-6293
dc.identifier.issn1107-0625
dc.identifier.pubmed25261676
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/237719
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000342963300037
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherIMPRIMATUR PUBLICATIONS
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF BUON
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectcancer
dc.subjectfalse-positive
dc.subjectpositron emission tomography
dc.subjectpulmonary nodule
dc.subjecttuberculosis
dc.subjectPOSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY
dc.subjectSOLITARY PULMONARY NODULES
dc.subjectCELL LUNG-CANCER
dc.subjectFDG-PET
dc.subjectDIFFERENTIATION
dc.subjectBIOPSY
dc.subjectCT
dc.titleFalse positive PET scan deserves attention
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage841
oaire.citation.issue3
oaire.citation.startPage836
oaire.citation.titleJOURNAL OF BUON
oaire.citation.volume19

Files