Publication:
Comparison of the Pullout Strength of Different Pedicle Screw Designs and Augmentation Techniques in an Osteoporotic Bone Model

dc.contributor.authorBEZER, MURAT
dc.contributor.authorsKiyak, Gorkem; Balikci, Tevfik; Heydar, Ahmed Majid; Bezer, Murat
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-14T08:32:57Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-10T16:50:59Z
dc.date.available2022-03-14T08:32:57Z
dc.date.issued2018-02-28
dc.description.abstractStudy Design: Mechanical study. Purpose: To compare the pullout strength of different screw designs and augmentation techniques in an osteoporotic bone model. Overview of Literature: Adequate bone screw pullout strength is a common problem among osteoporotic patients. Various screw designs and augmentation techniques have been developed to improve the biomechanical characteristics of the bone-screw interface. Methods: Polyurethane blocks were used to mimic human osteoporotic cancellous bone, and six different screw designs were tested. Five standard and expandable screws without augmentation, eight expandable screws with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) or calcium phosphate augmentation, and distal cannulated screws with PMMA and calcium phosphate augmentation were tested. Mechanical tests were performed on 10 unused new screws of each group. Screws with or without augmentation were inserted in a block that was held in a fixture frame, and a longitudinal extraction force was applied to the screw head at a loading rate of 5 mm/min. Maximum load was recorded in a load displacement curve. Results: The peak pullout force of all tested screws with or without augmentation was significantly greater than that of the standard pedicle screw. The greatest pullout force was observed with 40-mm expandable pedicle screws with four fins and PMMA augmentation. Augmented distal cannulated screws did not have a greater peak pullout force than nonaugmented expandable screws. PMMA augmentation provided a greater peak pullout force than calcium phosphate augmentation. Conclusions: Expandable pedicle screws had greater peak pullout forces than standard pedicle screws and had the advantage of augmentation with either PMMA or calcium phosphate cement. Although calcium phosphate cement is biodegradable, osteoconductive, and nonexothermic, PMMA provided a significantly greater peak pullout force. PMMA-augmented expandable 40-mm four-fin pedicle screws had the greatest peak pullout force.
dc.identifier.doi10.4184/asj.2018.12.1.3
dc.identifier.eissn1976-7846
dc.identifier.issn1976-1902
dc.identifier.pubmed29503676
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/241955
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000425873000002
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherKOREAN SOC SPINE SURGERY
dc.relation.ispartofASIAN SPINE JOURNAL
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectScrew
dc.subjectPedicle
dc.subjectExpandable
dc.subjectOsteoporosis
dc.subjectAugmentation
dc.subjectPOLYMETHYLMETHACRYLATE AUGMENTATION
dc.subjectCEMENT AUGMENTATION
dc.subjectSPINAL SURGERY
dc.subjectFIXATION
dc.subjectVERTEBRAE
dc.subjectINJECTION
dc.titleComparison of the Pullout Strength of Different Pedicle Screw Designs and Augmentation Techniques in an Osteoporotic Bone Model
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage11
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.startPage3
oaire.citation.titleASIAN SPINE JOURNAL
oaire.citation.volume12

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
file.pdf
Size:
1.43 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format