Publication:
Assessment of Masseter Muscle Appearance and Thickness in Edentulous and Dentate Patients by Ultrasonography

dc.contributor.authorKESER, GAYE
dc.contributor.authorNAMDAR PEKİNER, FİLİZ MEDİHA
dc.contributor.authorsMayil, Meltem; Keser, Gaye; Demir, Arzu; Pekiner, Filiz Namdar
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-14T09:03:15Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T15:27:38Z
dc.date.available2022-03-14T09:03:15Z
dc.date.issued2018-09-28
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The purpose of the present study was to examine ultrasonographic appearances of Masseter Muscle (MM) in dentate and edentulous patients without Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD). Materials and Methods: The thickness of the MM in 25 dentate (mean age: 30,68 +/- 10,49) and 24 edentulous (mean age: 61,46 +/- 9,71) patients, who visited routine dental examination, was measured at rest and at maximum contraction bilaterally. Examinations were performed using an Aloka Prosound a6 (Hitachi Aloka Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an 8 MHz-wide bandwidth linear active matrix transducer (ranging from 1 to 15 MHz). The visibility and width of the internal echogenic bands of the MM were also assessed and the muscle appearance was classified as I of III types. Type I, characterized by the clear visibility of the fine bands; Type II, thickening echogenicity of the bands; Type III, disappearance or reduction in a number of the bands. Results: MM thickness at rest and contraction in the dentate group were significantly higher than the edentulous group (p < 0.05). Type I was the most common echogenic type in both dentate (right: 16 (64%), left; 15 (60%)) and edentulous patients (right; 22 (91.7%), left; 18 (75%)). In a dentate group, type II was significantly higher than the edentulous group in both the right and left sides (p < 0.05; p < 0.01, respectively). Age and gender seemed to have no significant effect on the echogenic type (p > 0.05). Conclusion: There were significant differences in the thickness at rest and contraction between the dentate and edentulous groups. It was clarified that ultrasonographic features of the MM in dentate and edentulous patients were different.
dc.identifier.doi10.2174/1745017901814010723
dc.identifier.issn1874-2106
dc.identifier.pubmed30369982
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/242243
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000451575700027
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
dc.relation.ispartofOPEN DENTISTRY JOURNAL
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectUltrasonographic appearances
dc.subjectMasseter muscle
dc.subjectDentate group
dc.subjectEdentulous patients
dc.subjectEchogenic type
dc.subjectTemporomandibular disorder
dc.subjectTEMPOROMANDIBULAR DISORDER
dc.subjectMASTICATORY PERFORMANCE
dc.subjectFACIAL MORPHOLOGY
dc.subjectFEATURES
dc.titleAssessment of Masseter Muscle Appearance and Thickness in Edentulous and Dentate Patients by Ultrasonography
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage734
oaire.citation.startPage723
oaire.citation.titleOPEN DENTISTRY JOURNAL
oaire.citation.volume12

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
file.pdf
Size:
743.09 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format