Publication:
Poor Biological Factors and Prognosis of Interval Breast Cancers: Long-Term Results of Bahceehir (Istanbul) Breast Cancer Screening Project in Turkey

dc.contributor.authorsCabioglu, Neslihan; Guerdal, Sibel OEzkan; Kayhan, Arda; OEzaydin, Niluefer; Sahin, Cennet; Can, OEmuer; OEzcinar, Beyza; Aykuter, Goenuel; Vatandas, Guelcin; Aribal, Erkin; OEzmen, Vahit
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-14T09:24:42Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-10T19:17:07Z
dc.date.available2022-03-14T09:24:42Z
dc.date.issued2020-11
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE The Turkish Bahceehir Breast Cancer Screening Project was a 10-year, organized, population-based screening program carried out in Bahceehir county, Istanbul. Our aim was to examine the biologic features and outcome of screen-detected and interval breast cancers during the 10-year study period. METHODS Between 2009 and 2019, 2-view mammograms were obtained at 2-year intervals for women aged 40 to 69 years. Clinicopathological characteristics including ER, PR, HER2-neu, and Ki-67 status were analyzed for those diagnosed with breast cancer. RESULTS In 8,758 screened women, 131 breast cancers (1.5%) were detected. The majority of patients (82.3%) had prognostic stage 0-I disease. Contrarily, patients with interval cancers (n = 15; 11.4%) were more likely to have a worse prognostic stage (II-IV disease; odds ratio [OR], 3.59, 95% CI, 0.9 to 14.5) and high Ki-67 scores (OR, 3.14; 95% CI, 0.9 to 11.2). Interval cancers detected within 1 year were more likely to have a luminal B (57.1% v 31.9%) and triple-negative (14.3% v 1%) subtype and less likely to have a luminal A subtype (28.6% v 61.5%; P = .04). Patients with interval cancers had a poor outcome in 10-year disease-specific (DSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) compared with those with screen-detected cancers (DSS: 68.2% v 98.1%, P = .002; DFS: 78.6% v 96.5%, P = .011). CONCLUSION Our findings suggest the majority of screen-detected breast cancers exhibited a luminal A subtype profile with an excellent prognosis. However, interval cancers were more likely to have aggressive subtypes such as luminal B subtype or triple-negative cancers associated with a poor prognosis requiring other preventive strategies. (c) 2020 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
dc.identifier.doi10.1200/GO.20.00145
dc.identifier.eissn2687-8941
dc.identifier.pubmed32678710
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/243086
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000564861600023
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
dc.relation.ispartofJCO GLOBAL ONCOLOGY
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectMAMMOGRAPHY
dc.subjectPROGRAM
dc.subjectBIOMARKERS
dc.subjectIMPACT
dc.subjectRISK
dc.subjectCARCINOMAS
dc.subjectEXPRESSION
dc.subjectMORTALITY
dc.subjectSTAGE
dc.subjectAGE
dc.titlePoor Biological Factors and Prognosis of Interval Breast Cancers: Long-Term Results of Bahceehir (Istanbul) Breast Cancer Screening Project in Turkey
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage1113
oaire.citation.startPage1103
oaire.citation.titleJCO GLOBAL ONCOLOGY
oaire.citation.volume6

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
file.pdf
Size:
705.59 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format