Publication:
Effect of Positive Airway Pressure on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Coronary Artery Disease Patients with Nonsleepy Obstructive Sleep Apnea The RICCADSA Randomized Controlled Trial

dc.contributor.authorsPeker, Yuksel; Glantz, Helena; Eulenburg, Christine; Wegscheider, Karl; Herlitz, Johan; Thunstrom, Erik
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T20:30:00Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-10T20:40:17Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T20:30:00Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractRationale: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), many of whom do not report daytime sleepiness. First-line treatment for symptomatic OSA is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), but its value in patients without daytime sleepiness is uncertain. Objectives: To determine the effects of CPAP on long-term adverse cardiovascular outcome risk in patients with CAD with nonsleepy OSA. Methods: This single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, open label, blinded evaluation trial was conducted between December 2005 and November 2010. Consecutive patients with newly revascularized CAD and OSA (apnea-hypopnea index >= 15/h) without daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale score <10) were randomized to auto-titrating CPAP (n = 122) or no positive airway pressure (n = 122). Measurements and Main Results: The primary endpoint was the first event of repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular mortality. Median follow-up was 57 months. The incidence of the primary endpoint did not differ significantly in patients who did versus did not receive CPAP (18.1% vs. 22.1%; hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-1.41; P = 0.449). Adjusted on-treatment analysis showed a significant cardiovascular risk reduction in those who used CPAP for >= 4 versus <4 hours per night or did not receive treatment (hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.10-0.86; P= 0.026). Conclusions: Routine prescription of CPAP to patients with CAD with nonsleepy OSA did not significantly reduce long-term adverse cardiovascular outcomes in the intention-to-treat population. There was a significant reduction after adjustment for baseline comorbidities and compliance with the treatment.
dc.identifier.doi10.1164/rccm.201601-0088OC
dc.identifier.eissn1535-4970
dc.identifier.issn1073-449X
dc.identifier.pubmed26914592
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/234141
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000382416100017
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAMER THORACIC SOC
dc.relation.ispartofAMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectobstructive sleep apnea
dc.subjectcoronary artery disease
dc.subjectcardiovascular outcomes
dc.subjectBLOOD-PRESSURE
dc.subjectFOLLOW-UP
dc.subjectTHERAPY
dc.subjectCPAP
dc.subjectINTERVENTION
dc.subjectRATIONALE
dc.subjectADHERENCE
dc.subjectHYPERTENSION
dc.subjectPREDICTORS
dc.subjectSURGERY
dc.titleEffect of Positive Airway Pressure on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Coronary Artery Disease Patients with Nonsleepy Obstructive Sleep Apnea The RICCADSA Randomized Controlled Trial
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage620
oaire.citation.issue5
oaire.citation.startPage613
oaire.citation.titleAMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
oaire.citation.volume194

Files