Publication:
Are myelodysplastic children receiving sufficient health care in Turkey? An analysis of the problems in primary management and their impact on neuro-urological outcome

dc.contributor.authorALPAY, HARİKA
dc.contributor.authorTANIDIR, YILÖREN
dc.contributor.authorsTarcan T., Önol F.F., Tanidir Y., Alpay H., Ilker Y., Şimşek F., Özek M.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-15T01:55:54Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T10:38:12Z
dc.date.available2022-03-15T01:55:54Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.description.abstractObjective: To investigate the problems in the primary care of children with spina bifida and to analyze their impact on neuro-urological outcome in Turkey. Information from mothers about the disease, difficulties in getting medical services, availability and efficacy of prenatal ultrasound, and folic acid intake was also assessed. Patients: A retrospective review of 476 children registered in the pediatric urology section of our institutional multidisciplinary spina bifida clinic between 1996 and 2005 was made. All children were assessed for the time of primary repair, time to first neuro-urological visit, and compliance to follow up. A phone interview was made with 166 mothers to obtain data regarding their educational status, supplementary folic acid intake before/during gestation, compliance to obstetric follow up, prenatal diagnosis and counseling, information about the importance of neuro-urological surveillance, and difficulties in neuro-urological follow up. Results: Two-thirds of the mothers had an educational status of elementary school or lower. Phone interviews revealed inadequate obstetric follow up in 42% and a low prenatal diagnosis rate (49%) in those under regular follow up. Chart review revealed a significant delay in timing of primary surgical closure (mean 3 months and 2.9 years for open and closed lesions, respectively) and first neuro-urological follow-up visit (mean 1.8 years and 9.7 months after primary repair for open and occult lesions, respectively). Reasons for delayed closure were misguided advice of the nurse/midwife involved in delivery and inability to obtain tertiary health care. Socioeconomic inadequacy of the families and inefficacy of the health insurance system were the most important factors impairing follow up. Conclusions: Serious problems exist in the prevention, prenatal diagnosis and primary management of children with myelodysplasia in Turkey. As a consequence, neuro-urological follow up starts relatively late, which adversely affects the urological prognosis. © 2006 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jpurol.2006.02.002
dc.identifier.issn14775131
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/246799
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Pediatric Urology
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectMyelodysplasia
dc.subjectNeurogenic bladder
dc.subjectPrenatal diagnosis
dc.subjectPrevention
dc.subjectPrimary closure
dc.titleAre myelodysplastic children receiving sufficient health care in Turkey? An analysis of the problems in primary management and their impact on neuro-urological outcome
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage23
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.startPage19
oaire.citation.titleJournal of Pediatric Urology
oaire.citation.volume3

Files