Publication:
The new Avicenna Roboflex: How does the irrigation system work? Results from an in vitro experiment

dc.contributor.authorŞENER, TARIK EMRE
dc.contributor.authorsButtice, Salvatore; Sahin, Bahadir; Sener, Tarik Emre; Dragos, Laurian; Proietti, Silvia; Doizi, Steeve; Traxer, Olivier
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-14T09:04:37Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T16:26:01Z
dc.date.available2022-03-14T09:04:37Z
dc.date.issued2018-09-30
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Since 2012 Elmed has been working on a robot specifically designed for flexible ureteroscopy. After the first version of Avicenna Roboflex, a second version was developed in 2015, with significant changes especially in the irrigation system. We consider mandatory for the endourologist that works with the Avicenna Roboflex be aware of the functioning of the irrigation system. Materials and Methods: We connected a container to the pump's irrigation system and measured the quantity of saline per second delivered by each speed setting, with/without the flush in five different modalities: pump on its own, pump with ureteroscope, with two laser fibers, with 1.9 Fr basket, and with a Terumo guidewire. Results: The highest mean flow-rates were observed in the 200-micrometer laser fiber, after the pump on its own. Median flow-rates for all speed settings were significantly higher for the pump on its own than for the URS in both flushed and non-flushed modes (p = 0.045, p = 0.039 respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in median flow-rates between the guide wire and basket in all of the speed settings (p = 0.932 and p = 0.977). For both laser fibers there was no statistically significant difference between the median flow rate on both non-flush and flush modes. (p = 0.590 & p = 0.590). There was a linear correlation between the speed setting and the increase measured with the flush-option for pump only measurements (r = 0.602, p = 0.038). There was no statistically significant difference between laser fibers and the pump on its own on the increase of flow rate with flush mode. (p = 0.443 for the 272-micrometer fiber and p = 0.219 for the 200-micrometer fiber). Conclusion: The irrigation system of the new Avicenna Roboflex is optimized compared to the previous version. However other more complex studies concerning the live flow/pressure relationship are needed before firm conclusions can be made.
dc.identifier.doi10.4081/aiua.2018.3.155
dc.identifier.eissn2282-4197
dc.identifier.issn1124-3562
dc.identifier.pubmed30362676
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/242405
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000456102300002
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherPAGEPRESS PUBL
dc.relation.ispartofARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectRenal stone
dc.subjectUreteroscopy
dc.subjectAvicenna Roboflex
dc.subjectIrrigation system
dc.subjectFlexible ureteroscopy
dc.subjectIntrarenal flow
dc.subjectUrolithiasis
dc.subjectFLEXIBLE URETERORENOSCOPY
dc.subjectFLOW
dc.subjectURETEROSCOPY
dc.titleThe new Avicenna Roboflex: How does the irrigation system work? Results from an in vitro experiment
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage158
oaire.citation.issue3
oaire.citation.startPage155
oaire.citation.titleARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA
oaire.citation.volume90

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
file.pdf
Size:
624.82 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format