Publication: The value of plasma D-dimer level on admission in predicting no-reflow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention and long-term prognosis in patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction
| dc.contributor.author | TİGEN, MUSTAFA KÜRŞAT | |
| dc.contributor.authors | Erkol, Ayhan; Oduncu, Vecih; Turan, Burak; Kilicgedik, Alev; Sirma, Dicle; Gozubuyuk, Gokhan; Karabay, Can Yucel; Guler, Ahmet; Dundar, Cihan; Tigen, Kursat; Pala, Selcuk; Kirma, Cevat | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-13T12:46:46Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-11T13:15:59Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-03-13T12:46:46Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
| dc.description.abstract | D-dimer is a final product of fibrin degradation and gives an indirect estimation of the thrombotic burden. We aimed to investigate the value of plasma D-dimer levels on admission in predicting no-reflow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI) and long-term prognosis in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We retrospectively involved 569 patients treated with p-PCI for acute STEMIs. We prospectively followed up the patients for a median duration of 38 months. Angiographic no-reflow was defined as postprocedural thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade < 3 or TIMI 3 with a myocardial blush grade < 2. Electrocardiographic no-reflow was defined as ST-segment resolution < 70 %. The primary clinical end points were mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The incidences of angiographic and electrocardiographic no-reflow were 31 and 39 % respectively. At multivariable analysis, D-dimer was found to be an independent predictor of both angiographic (p < 0.001), and electrocardiographic (p < 0.001) no-reflow. Both mortality (from Q1 to Q4, 5.7, 6.4, 11.3 and 34.1 %, respectively, p < 0.001) and MACE (from Q1 to Q4, 17.9, 29.3, 36.9 and 52.2 %, respectively, p < 0.001) rates at long-term follow-up were highest in patients with admission D-dimer levels in the highest quartile (Q4), compared to the rates in other quartiles. However, Cox proportional hazard model revealed that high D-dimer on admission (Q4) was not an independent predictor of mortality or MACE. In contrast, electrocardiographic no-reflow was independently predictive of both mortality [Hazard ratio (HR) 2.88, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.04-8.58, p = 0.041] and MACE [HR 1.90, 95 % CI 1.32-4.71, p = 0.042]. In conclusion, plasma D-dimer level on admission independently predicts no-reflow after p-PCI. However, D-dimer has no independent prognostic value in patients with STEMI. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s11239-013-1044-3 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1573-742X | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0929-5305 | |
| dc.identifier.pubmed | 24407374 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11424/237976 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000341085300008 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | SPRINGER | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
| dc.subject | D-dimer | |
| dc.subject | No-reflow | |
| dc.subject | Primary angioplasty | |
| dc.subject | Myocardial infarction | |
| dc.subject | Prognosis | |
| dc.subject | PRIMARY ANGIOPLASTY | |
| dc.subject | DISTAL EMBOLIZATION | |
| dc.subject | CHEST-PAIN | |
| dc.subject | REPERFUSION | |
| dc.subject | THERAPY | |
| dc.subject | PREVENTION | |
| dc.subject | FEATURES | |
| dc.subject | TRIALS | |
| dc.title | The value of plasma D-dimer level on admission in predicting no-reflow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention and long-term prognosis in patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction | |
| dc.type | article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| oaire.citation.endPage | 347 | |
| oaire.citation.issue | 3 | |
| oaire.citation.startPage | 339 | |
| oaire.citation.title | JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS | |
| oaire.citation.volume | 38 |
