Publication:
Which therapy works better in choroid plexus carcinomas?

dc.contributor.authorsBerrak, Su G.; Liu, Diane D.; Wrede, Brigitte; Wolff, Johannes E.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T18:04:59Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T09:16:33Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T18:04:59Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractChoroid plexus carcinomas (CPCs) are rare tumors with dismal outcome. While it has been established that surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy improve survival, the best chemotherapy drugs for treating this disease still need to be identified. Since CPC is too rare to permit a prospective clinical trial, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of individual drugs in patients with CPCs. We expanded a pre-existing database and included all cases of choroid plexus tumors, identified in PubMed through the end of 2007, for a total of 906 patients. At first, we restricted the analysis to patients with histologically confirmed CPC (n = 361) and with residual tumor after surgery (n = 130/361 patients), and we compared response and survival between patients who received a particular drug and those who did not. Response to chemotherapy was documented in 43 patients. Of the drugs used in these patients, etoposide was associated with the highest response rate (17/36). Next survival was compared among all CPC. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests suggested a statistically significant treatment benefit for cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and carboplatin, while the effect of vincristine was found to be marginally significant (P = 0.07, log rank). Of these, only etoposide's effect could be confirmed in a limited Cox multiple regression analysis. In conclusion, etoposide should be included in future standard treatment protocols. However the survival rates are still unsatisfactory, and additional novel drugs should be studied in prospective multicenter studies.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11060-010-0372-9
dc.identifier.eissn1573-7373
dc.identifier.issn0167-594X
dc.identifier.pubmed20976614
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/230553
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000290323100014
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSPRINGER
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectChoroid plexus tumors
dc.subjectChemotherapy
dc.subjectEtoposide
dc.subjectTreatment
dc.subjectRECURRENT BRAIN-TUMORS
dc.subjectTOPOISOMERASE-II
dc.subjectORAL ETOPOSIDE
dc.subjectPHASE-II
dc.subjectYOUNG-CHILDREN
dc.subjectPOSTOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY
dc.subjectCEREBROSPINAL-FLUID
dc.subjectMALIGNANT GLIOMA
dc.subjectIN-VITRO
dc.subjectDNA
dc.titleWhich therapy works better in choroid plexus carcinomas?
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage162
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.startPage155
oaire.citation.titleJOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY
oaire.citation.volume103

Files