Publication:
Comparison of early results of vascularized and non-vascularized fibular grafting in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head

dc.contributor.authorsTetik, Cihangir; Basar, Hakan; Bezer, Murat; Erol, Bulent; Agir, Ismail; Esemenli, Tanil
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T18:04:52Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-10T18:58:17Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T18:04:52Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractObjective: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head, a disease primarily affecting young adults, is often associated with the collapse of the articular surface and subsequent arthrosis. Some authors have reported good results with the use of vascularized and non-vascularized fibular grafts to treat osteonecrotic lesions of the femoral head. The aim of this study was to compare the results of vascularized fibular grafting with that of non-vascularized fibular grafting in the treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis. Methods: Between January 1999 and June 2008, 11 osteonecrotic hips of 8 patients who underwent vascularized fibular grafting and 15 osteonecrotic hips of 13 patients who underwent non-vascularized fibular grafting were compared according to etiology, stage, age, sex, preoperative and postoperative first year Harris hip and VAS scores. Results: Steroid use was the most common etiologic factor, found in 26 hips of 21 patients in the entire patient population. There was no significant difference between the two groups according to their age, sex and preoperative Harris hip scores (p>0.05). According to the Ficat staging system for radiological evaluation, 4 hips were Grade 2A, 4 hips were Grade 2B, and 3 hips were Grade 3 in the vascularized group and 8 hips were Grade 2A, 3 hips Grade 2B, 3 hips Grade 3 and one hip was identified as Grade 4 in the non-vascularized group. When the Harris hip and VAS scores of both groups were evaluated, the group treated by vascularized fibular grafting had significantly higher scores than the ones treated by non-vascularized fibular grafting in the other group (p<0.05). Furthermore, when the Harris hip and VAS scores of preoperative and postoperative first year of vascularized fibular grafting patients were compared, there were significantly higher scores after the surgery. Conclusion: Although there was no significant radiological difference in the early results of both surgical techniques, the clinical results of vascularized fibular grafting treatment were significantly better than the results of non-vascularized fibular grafting treatment in the osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Vascularized fibular grafting improves the clinical status at an early period and prevents subchondral collapse.
dc.identifier.doi10.3944/AOTT.2011.2259
dc.identifier.issn1017-995X
dc.identifier.pubmed22032997
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/230498
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000208713300007
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherTURKISH ASSOC ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY
dc.relation.ispartofACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectFemur head osteonecrosis
dc.subjectfibular grafting
dc.subjectFicat staging
dc.subjectvascularized fibular grafting
dc.subjectNONTRAUMATIC AVASCULAR NECROSIS
dc.subjectCORE DECOMPRESSION
dc.subjectASEPTIC NECROSIS
dc.subjectNATURAL-HISTORY
dc.subjectHIPS
dc.subjectOSTEOTOMY
dc.titleComparison of early results of vascularized and non-vascularized fibular grafting in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage334
oaire.citation.issue5
oaire.citation.startPage326
oaire.citation.titleACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA
oaire.citation.volume45

Files