Publication: Modeling Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells Dynamics by Serological and Imaging Biomarkers to Explain the Different Responses to Sorafenib and Regorafenib
| dc.contributor.author | DEMİRTAŞ, COŞKUN ÖZER | |
| dc.contributor.authors | Colombatto, Piero; Demirtas, Coskun Ozer; Ricco, Gabriele; Civitano, Luigi; Boraschi, Piero; Scalise, Paola; Cavallone, Daniela; Oliveri, Filippo; Romagnoli, Veronica; Bleve, Patrizia; Coco, Barbara; Salvati, Antonio; Urbani, Lucio; Bonino, Ferruccio; Brunetto, Maurizia Rossana | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-14T09:56:57Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-10T19:07:48Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-03-14T09:56:57Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-04-25 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Simple Summary Systemic therapy in advanced hepatocellular-carcinomas (HCC) has limited benefits, but some patients show partial responses (PR) and a few even a complete response (CR). Understanding the biological mechanisms could help clinicians in decision-making. Aim of this study was to develop a physic-mathematical model to investigate tumor dynamics using alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and protein induced by vitamin K absence-II (PIVKA-II) measures combined with digital imaging. The model was set-up in three prototype patients with CR/PR to sorafenib and PR to regorafenib, and then applied in seven patients with different types of response. Overall, the rate constant of cancer cells production ranged between 0.250-0.372 C x day(-1). During therapy, neo-angiogenesis reduction was higher in four CR than in four PR or stable disease (SD) and in two non-responders (median: 83.2% vs. 29.4% vs. 2.0%). Tumor vasculature decay appeared accelerated in CR. We conclude that modeling serological and imaging biomarkers could help personalization of systemic therapy. In advanced HCC, tyrosine-kinase inhibitors obtain partial responses (PR) in some patients and complete responses (CR) in a few. Better understanding of the mechanism of response could be achieved by the radiomic approach combining digital imaging and serological biomarkers (alpha-fetoprotein, AFP and protein induced by vitamin K absence-II, PIVKA-II) kinetics. A physic-mathematical model was developed to investigate cancer cells and vasculature dynamics in three prototype patients receiving sorafenib and/or regorafenib and applied in seven others for validation. Overall four patients showed CR, two PR, two stable-disease (SD) and two progressive-disease (PD). The rate constant of cancer cells production was higher in PD than in PR-SD and CR (median: 0.398 vs. 0.325 vs. 0.316 C x day(-1)). Therapy induced reduction of neo-angiogenesis was greater in CR than in PR-SD and PD (median: 83.2% vs. 29.4% and 2.0%), as the reduction of cell-proliferation (55.2% vs. 7.6% and 0.7%). An additional dose-dependent acceleration of tumor vasculature decay was also observed in CR. AFP and cancer cells followed the same kinetics, whereas PIVKA-II time/dose dependent fluctuations were influenced also by tissue ischemia. In conclusion, pending confirmation in a larger HCC cohort, modeling serological and imaging biomarkers could be a new tool for systemic therapy personalization. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/cancers13092064 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2072-6694 | |
| dc.identifier.pubmed | 33922938 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11424/243742 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000649915500001 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | MDPI | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | CANCERS | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.subject | hepatocellular carcinoma | |
| dc.subject | HCC | |
| dc.subject | sorafenib | |
| dc.subject | regorafenib | |
| dc.subject | AFP | |
| dc.subject | PIVKA-II | |
| dc.subject | kinetics | |
| dc.subject | mathematical modeling | |
| dc.subject | digital imaging | |
| dc.subject | GAMMA-CARBOXY PROTHROMBIN | |
| dc.subject | TUMOR PROGRESSION | |
| dc.subject | SURVIVAL | |
| dc.subject | HYPOXIA | |
| dc.title | Modeling Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells Dynamics by Serological and Imaging Biomarkers to Explain the Different Responses to Sorafenib and Regorafenib | |
| dc.type | article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| oaire.citation.issue | 9 | |
| oaire.citation.title | CANCERS | |
| oaire.citation.volume | 13 |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
