Publication: 6102 Sayılı Türk Ticaret Kanunu'nda Teşebbüs Kavramı ve Tacir Sayılmasının Sonuçları
Abstract
6102 sayılı eski TTK (eTTK) gibi TTK da ticari işletmeyi temel kav- ram olarak kabul etmiştir. Bir çok kavram ticari işletmeyi esas alarak tanım- lanmıştır. Ancak, eTTKda bulunmayan şirketler topluluğu kurumu TTKda düzenlenmiş ve teşebbüs kavramına yer verilmiştir. Bu çerçevede hakim te- şebbüsün de tacir olduğu kabul edilmiştir. Böylelikle eskiye kıyasla önemli bir fark ortaya çıkmıştır. Teşebbüs kavramının kapsamı geniştir. Tüzel kişiliği bulunmayan birlikler de teşebbüs olabilir. Bu sayede oldukça farklı bir tacir grubu ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu konu bilhassa tacir olmanın neticeleri açısından büyük önem taşımaktadır. Makalede öncelikle teşebbüs, ticari işletme ve ta- cir kavramları karşılaştırılmış, akabinde kimlerin ne surette şirketler toplulu- ğunun hakim teşebbüsü olabileceği değerlendirilmiştir. Son olarak da hakim teşebbüsün tacir sayılmasının neticeleri incelenmiştir. Tacir olmanın hüküm ve sonuçları tek tek ele alınmış ve bunların hakim teşebbüse uygulanıp uygu- lanamayacakları değerlendirilmiştir.
Just like the Turkish Commercial Code numbered 6762, the Tur- kish Commercial Code (TCC) has adopted commercial enterprise as the basic concept. Many concepts have been defined on the basis of commercial enterprises. However, the concept of Group Companies and Undertakings have been regulated in the TCC, which did not exist in the former TCC. Within this framework Dominant Undertaking is considered as the merchant, by way of which a significant difference has emerged. The scope of the concept of Undertaking is broad. The associations without legal entities may be Undertakings. Thus, a quite different group of merchants have arisen. This, it is of great importan- ce in terms of the consequences of being a merchant. In this article primarily, the concepts of Undertaking, commercial enterprises and merchant are compared. Later, who and how may be the dominant undertaking in group of companies are evaluated. Finally, the conse- quences of dominated enterprises being merchant are examined. The consequences of being merchant are considered one by one and it is evaluated whether it will be applicable to the dominant Undertaking.
Just like the Turkish Commercial Code numbered 6762, the Tur- kish Commercial Code (TCC) has adopted commercial enterprise as the basic concept. Many concepts have been defined on the basis of commercial enterprises. However, the concept of Group Companies and Undertakings have been regulated in the TCC, which did not exist in the former TCC. Within this framework Dominant Undertaking is considered as the merchant, by way of which a significant difference has emerged. The scope of the concept of Undertaking is broad. The associations without legal entities may be Undertakings. Thus, a quite different group of merchants have arisen. This, it is of great importan- ce in terms of the consequences of being a merchant. In this article primarily, the concepts of Undertaking, commercial enterprises and merchant are compared. Later, who and how may be the dominant undertaking in group of companies are evaluated. Finally, the conse- quences of dominated enterprises being merchant are examined. The consequences of being merchant are considered one by one and it is evaluated whether it will be applicable to the dominant Undertaking.