Publication:
Effect of Varying Water-to-Powder Ratios and Ultrasonic Placement on the Compressive Strength of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate

dc.contributor.authorBAŞTÜRK, FATIMA BETÜL
dc.contributor.authorGÜNDAY, MAHİR
dc.contributor.authorsBasturk, Fatima B.; Nekoofan, Mohammad Hossein; Gunday, Mahir; Dummen, Paul M. H.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-13T12:51:02Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T18:02:17Z
dc.date.available2022-03-13T12:51:02Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The purpose of this study was to compare the compressive strength of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) when mixed with 2 different water-to-powder (WP) proportions using either hand or ultra sonic placement. Methods: Tooth-colored ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and white MTA Angelus (Angelus Solucoes Odontologicas, Londrina, Brazil) were investigated. One gram of each MTA powder was mixed with either 0.34 or 0.40 g distilled water. The 4 groups were further divided into 2 groups of 5 specimens for each of the following techniques: conventional (ie, hand placement) and placement using indirect ultrasonic activation for 30 seconds. All specimens were subjected to compressive strength testing after 4 days. The results were statistically analyzed with multivariate analysis of variance and Tukey Honestly Significant Difference tests at a significance level of P < .05. Results: The mean compressive strength values of ProRoot MTA (84.17 +/- 22.68) were significantly greater than those of MTA Angelus (47.71 +/- 14.29) (P < .01). Specimens mixed with the 0.34 WP ratio had higher compressive strength values (72.85 +/- 25.77) than those mixed with the 0.40 WP ratio (56.69 +/- 24.85) (P < .05). The highest compressive strength values were recorded for ProRoot MTA specimens that were mixed in the 0.34 WP ratio, and then the samples were placed with ultrasonic activation (mean = 91.35 MPa). The lowest values were recorded for MTA Angelus samples that were mixed in the 0.40 WP ratio, and the specimens were placed without ultrasonic activation (mean = 36.36 MPa). Ultrasonic activation had no significant difference in terms of compressive strength. Conclusions: When using ProRoot MTA and MTA Angelus, higher WP ratios resulted in lower compressive strength values. Ultrasonication had no significant effect on the compressive strength of the material regardless of the WP ratio that was used. Therefore, adherence to the manufacturer's recommended WP ratio when preparing MTA for use in dental applications is advised.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joen.2014.10.022
dc.identifier.eissn1878-3554
dc.identifier.issn0099-2399
dc.identifier.pubmed25576207
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/238432
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000353076700018
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectCompressive strength
dc.subjectmineral trioxide aggregate
dc.subjectultrasonic agitation
dc.subjectwater-to-powder ratio
dc.subjectPHOSPHATE DENTAL CEMENT
dc.subjectFLEXURAL STRENGTH
dc.subjectMIXING TECHNIQUES
dc.subjectMTA SOLUBILITY
dc.subjectPARTICLE-SIZE
dc.subjectPOROSITY
dc.titleEffect of Varying Water-to-Powder Ratios and Ultrasonic Placement on the Compressive Strength of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage534
oaire.citation.issue4
oaire.citation.startPage531
oaire.citation.titleJOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
oaire.citation.volume41

Files