Publication:
Grading and hemodynamic follow-up study of arteriovenous malformations with transcranial Doppler ultrasonography

dc.contributor.authorsKiliç T., Pamir M.N., Budd S., Ozek M.M., Erzen C.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-15T01:53:35Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T13:22:44Z
dc.date.available2022-03-15T01:53:35Z
dc.date.issued1998
dc.description.abstractThis study presents and tests the clinical validity of a hemodynamic grading system that depends on noninvasive transcranial Doppler ultrasonographic parameters. The suggested transcranial Doppler-based grading system was compared with the Spetzler-Martin anatomic grading for prognosticative validity and clinical dependability. We concluded the following: (1) The pulsatility index was shown to be a more dependable transcranial Doppler parameter in the clinical evaluation of an arteriovenous malformation because of two reasons: preoperative pulsatility index findings inversely correlated with arteriovenous malformation volume, and the pulsatility index returned to normal values before the mean blood flow velocity did. Therefore, hemodynamic arteriovenous malformation grading can be based on the pulsatility index. (2) A transcranial Doppler-based hemodynamic arteriovenous malformation grading system correlated highly with the Spetzler-Martin grading in predicting postoperative neurologic deficits and adverse radiologic findings. (3) The presented grading system may contribute to the standardization and quantification of the hemodynamic changes during multidisciplinary management of arteriovenous malformations.This study presents and tests the clinical validity of a hemodynamic grading system that depends on noninvasive transcranial Doppler ultrasonographic parameters. The suggested transcranial Doppler-based grading system was compared with the Spetzler-Martin anatomic grading for prognosticative validity and clinical dependability. We concluded the following: (1) The pulsability index was shown to be a more dependable transcranial Doppler parameter in the clinical evaluation of an arteriovenous malformation because of two reasons: preoperative pulsability index findings inversely correlated with arteriovenous malformation volume, and the pulsability index returned to normal values before the mean blood flow velocity did. Therefore, hemodynamic arteriovenous malformation grading can be based on the pulsatility index. (2) A transcranial Doppler-based hemodynamic arteriovenous malformation grading system correlated highly with the Spetzler-Martin grading in predicting postoperative neurologic deficits and adverse radiologic findings. (3) The presented grading system may contribute to the standardization and quantification of the hemodynamic changes during multidisciplinary management of arteriovenous malformations.
dc.identifier.doi10.7863/jum.1998.17.12.729
dc.identifier.issn2784297
dc.identifier.pubmed9849944
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/246358
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Ltd, Laurel
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Ultrasound in Medicine
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectArteriovenous malformations
dc.subjectGrading
dc.subjectHemodynamics
dc.subjectTranscranial Doppler ultrasonography
dc.titleGrading and hemodynamic follow-up study of arteriovenous malformations with transcranial Doppler ultrasonography
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage738
oaire.citation.issue12
oaire.citation.startPage729
oaire.citation.titleJournal of Ultrasound in Medicine
oaire.citation.volume17

Files