Publication:
Comparison between Two Conical Induction Machines Designed for an Electric Vehicle Application

dc.contributor.authorsDemir, Ugur; Roggia, Sara; Akuner, Mustafa Caner
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T16:24:20Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T15:12:06Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T16:24:20Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractThis study focuses on the comparison between two conical machines designed for an electrical-vehicle application. An optimal case, with an optimal cone angle, is compared to a worst-case scenario where the tapering is increased up to the maximum allowed dimensions. Simulations show that when the cone angle is not appropriately chosen the advantages that a tapered motor can offer over a classical cylindrical machine can be lost. In order to show the worsening effects of a not well pondered cone angle choice, a prototype of the conical machine with the largest conical dimensions has been built. The results obtained using finite element models (FEM) have been confirmed through experimental tests demonstrating the validity of the numerical analyses.
dc.identifier.doidoiWOS:000589393300151
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-5386-9350-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/226306
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000589393300151
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherIEEE
dc.relation.ispartof2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ELECTRIC MACHINES & DRIVES CONFERENCE (IEMDC)
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectinduction motor
dc.subjectin-wheel motor
dc.subjecttapered rotor geometry
dc.subjectelectric vehicle
dc.subjecttraction motor
dc.titleComparison between Two Conical Induction Machines Designed for an Electric Vehicle Application
dc.typeconferenceObject
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage1037
oaire.citation.startPage1032
oaire.citation.title2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ELECTRIC MACHINES & DRIVES CONFERENCE (IEMDC)

Files