Publication:
Evaluation of perioperative nutritional status with subjective global assessment method in patients undergoing gastrointestinal cancer surgery

dc.contributor.authorERDİM, AYLİN
dc.contributor.authorsErdim, Aylin; Aktan, Ahmet Ozdemir
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-14T08:25:04Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T09:15:44Z
dc.date.available2022-03-14T08:25:04Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-12
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study was designed to evaluate the perioperative nutritional status of patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer using Subjective Global Assessment and surgeon behavior on nutritional support. Material and Methods: We recruited 100 patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer in one university and two state teaching hospitals. Subjective Global Assessment was administered to evaluate preoperative and postoperative nutritional status. Fifty-two patients in the state hospitals (Group 1) and 48 in the university hospital were assessed. Anthropometric and biochemical measurements were performed. Changes in preoperative Subjective Global Assessment scores and scores at the time of discharge and types of nutritional support were compared. Subjective Global Assessment-B was regarded as moderate and Subjective Global Assessment-C as heavy malnutrition. Results: Ten patients had Subjective Global Assessment-B and 29 had Subjective Global Assessment-C malnutrition in Group 1 and nine had Subjective Global Assessment-B and 31 had Subjective Global Assessment-C malnutrition in Group 2 during preoperative assessment. Respective numbers in postoperative assessment were 12 for Subjective Global Assessment-B and 30 for Subjective Global Assessment-C in Group 1 and 14 for Subjective Global Assessment-B and 26 for Subjective Global Assessment-C in Group 2. There was no difference between two groups. Nutritional methods according to Subjective Global Assessment evaluation in pre- and postoperative periods were not different between the groups. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the malnutrition rate is high among patients scheduled for gastrointestinal cancer surgery and the number of surgeons were inadequate to provide perioperative nutritional support. Both university and state hospitals had similar shortcomings. Subjective Global Assessment is an easy and reliable test and if utilized will be helpful to detect patients requiring nutritional support.
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/turkjsurg.2017.3603
dc.identifier.eissn2564-7032
dc.identifier.issn2564-6850
dc.identifier.pubmed29260129
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/241745
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000417938100006
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAVES
dc.relation.ispartofTURKISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectGastrointestinal cancer
dc.subjectmalnutrition
dc.subjectperioperative nutrition
dc.subjectsubjective global assessment
dc.subjectSURGICAL-PATIENTS
dc.subjectMALNUTRITION
dc.titleEvaluation of perioperative nutritional status with subjective global assessment method in patients undergoing gastrointestinal cancer surgery
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage257
oaire.citation.issue4
oaire.citation.startPage253
oaire.citation.titleTURKISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY
oaire.citation.volume33

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
file.pdf
Size:
143.16 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format