Publication:
Individual responses to competing institutional logics in emerging markets

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorZAMANTILI NAYIR, DİLEK
dc.contributor.authorsMinbaeva, Dana; Muratbekova-Touron, Maral; Nayir, Dilek Zamantili; Moreira, Solon
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T22:58:44Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-10T19:58:50Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T22:58:44Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we study individual responses to competing institutional market and community logics. We argue that when individuals experience strong pressures both from market and community logics in hybrid contexts, they are unlikely to choose one logic over another. Instead, they combine both logics act as hybridizers. We identified three roles of local (Kazakhstani and Turkish) managers as hybridizers: bridging between competing logics, boundary spanning and cultural buffering.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101778
dc.identifier.eissn1873-6149
dc.identifier.issn0969-5931
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/237227
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000655653100001
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER
dc.relation.ispartofINTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectEmerging economies
dc.subjectCompeting institutional logics
dc.subjectIndividual responses
dc.subjectORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSES
dc.subjectCOMMUNITY
dc.subjectDIFFERENTIATION
dc.subjectEAST
dc.titleIndividual responses to competing institutional logics in emerging markets
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.issue4
oaire.citation.titleINTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW
oaire.citation.volume30

Files

Collections

Araştırma Çıktıları