Publication:
Satisfaction and comparison income in transition and developed economies

dc.contributor.authorDUMLUDAĞ, DEVRİM
dc.contributor.authorsDumludag D.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-15T02:10:28Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T19:16:11Z
dc.date.available2022-03-15T02:10:28Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractThe main purpose of this paper is to evaluate the impact of different types of income comparison on subjective well-being in transition countries and developed European countries. The paper relies on the Life in Transition Survey (European Bank for Reconstruction and Development 2011), which was conducted in late 2010 jointly by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the World Bank. The emphasis of the paper is on income comparisons, specifically; local comparisons and self-ranking. The main findings reveal that comparisons have a significant impact on life satisfaction in transition countries, whereas the relationship between comparison and life satisfaction is ambiguous in developed European countries. In transition countries, the impact of comparisons is asymmetric: in most cases, under-performing one's benchmark has a greater effect than out-performing it. In transition countries, both downward and upward evaluations have an impact on life satisfaction, while it is worthy of note that all upward evaluations have no effect on life satisfaction in developed European countries. © 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12232-014-0201-0
dc.identifier.issn18651704
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/247506
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Verlag
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Review of Economics
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectEconomic development
dc.subjectIncome comparisons
dc.subjectLife satisfaction
dc.subjectTransition countries
dc.titleSatisfaction and comparison income in transition and developed economies
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage152
oaire.citation.issue2
oaire.citation.startPage127
oaire.citation.titleInternational Review of Economics
oaire.citation.volume61

Files