Publication:
Implant Stability Outcomes After Immediate and Delayed Revascularized Free Fibula Flaps: A Preliminary Comparative Study

dc.contributor.authorSAÇAK, BÜLENT
dc.contributor.authorDURMUŞ KOCAASLAN, FATMA NİHAL
dc.contributor.authorÇELEBİLER, ÖZHAN BEKİR
dc.contributor.authorsCabbar, Fatih; Kocaaslan, F. Nihal Durmus; Sacak, Bulent; Capar, Gonca Duygu; Celebiler, Ozhan
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T22:26:57Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-10T19:13:50Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T22:26:57Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This pilot study investigated the retrospective outcomes of implants placed immediately or with a delayed protocol in revascularized free fibula flaps (FFF). Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing FFF between 2014 and 2017 were included in the study. Implants were inserted either immediately or 23.63 +/- 10.61 months after reconstructive surgery. Resonance frequency analyses were recorded at the time of implant placement (first control) and 4 months postoperatively while uncovering and screwing the gingiva formers (second control). The statistical significance level was set at P < .05. Results: Eight patients (four men, four women, mean age: 46.75 +/- 12.96 years) were included in the study. Twenty-six implants were placed in FFF (14 immediate, 12 delayed), and 28 were placed in the alveolus. All implant stability quotient (ISQ) scores were in high stability ranges. Statistically significant differences were observed between delayed (79.25 +/- 4.77) and immediate implant placement (73.14 +/- 7.42) at first controls, but not at second controls (79.17 +/- 3.59 and 76.00 +/- 6.18). The ISQ values of immediate implant placement significantly increased from first to second controls (P = .018). Bicortically placed implants showed significantly higher scores than unicortical implants (P < .05). ISQ values of FFF and alveolar bone groups were similar (P > .05). Conclusion: High stability scores similar to alveolar bone could be achieved by both immediate and delayed implant placement. Bicortical implantation results in better implant stability.
dc.identifier.doi10.11607/jomi.6725
dc.identifier.eissn1942-4434
dc.identifier.issn0882-2786
dc.identifier.pubmed30427969
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/235138
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000456083500024
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherQUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING CO INC
dc.relation.ispartofINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectdental implant
dc.subjectimplantation times
dc.subjectresonance frequency analyses
dc.subjectrevascularized free fibula flap
dc.subjectRESONANCE FREQUENCY-ANALYSIS
dc.subjectQUALITY-OF-LIFE
dc.subjectDENTAL IMPLANTS
dc.subjectMANDIBULAR RECONSTRUCTION
dc.subjectTITANIUM IMPLANTS
dc.subjectIN-VITRO
dc.subjectREHABILITATION
dc.subjectINTERFACE
dc.subjectMANDIBLES
dc.subjectDEFECTS
dc.titleImplant Stability Outcomes After Immediate and Delayed Revascularized Free Fibula Flaps: A Preliminary Comparative Study
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage1373
oaire.citation.issue6
oaire.citation.startPage1368
oaire.citation.titleINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS
oaire.citation.volume33

Files