Publication:
Effects of pulsed versus conventional radiofrequency current on rabbit dorsal root ganglion morphology

dc.contributor.authorsErdine, S; Yucel, A; Cimen, A; Aydin, S; Sav, A; Bilir, A
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T17:20:22Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-10T17:19:11Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T17:20:22Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.description.abstractLesioning using radiofrequency (RF) current has been increasingly used in clinical practice for the treatment of pain syndromes. Although formation of heat causing thermocoagulation of the nervous tissues is thought to be responsible of the clinical outcome, a more recent modality of RF application named pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) delivers the RF current without producing destructive levels of heat. In our study, we compared the effects of conventional RF (CRF) and PRF on rabbit dorsal root ganglion (DRG) morphology, including also control and sham operated groups. The setting of the experiment and the RF parameters used were similar to those used in current clinical practice. The specimens were analyzed both with light microscopy and electron microscopy, two weeks after the procedure. At the light microscopic level, all groups had preserved the normal DRG morphology and no differences were observed between them. In the electron microscopic analysis there were no pathological findings in the control and sham operated groups. But the ganglion cells in the RF groups had enlarged endoplasmic reticulum cisterns and increased number of cytoplasmic vacuoles which were more evident in the CRF group. Some of the ganglion cells in the CRF group had mitochondrial degeneration, nuclear membrane disorders or loss of nuclear membrane and neurolemma integrity. The myelinated and unmyelinated nerve fibers were of normal morphology in all groups. Our results suggest that PRF application is less destructive of cellular morphology than CRF at clinically used doses. Before making certain judgements, more experimental and clinical studies should be planned. (c) 2004 European Federation of Chapters of the International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejpain.2004.07.002
dc.identifier.eissn1532-2149
dc.identifier.issn1090-3801
dc.identifier.pubmed15862474
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/228229
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000229773000004
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.relation.ispartofEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectradiofrequency
dc.subjectpulsed
dc.subjectconventional
dc.subjectdorsal root ganglion
dc.subjectmorphology
dc.subjectultrastructure
dc.subjectTRIGEMINAL-NEURALGIA
dc.subjectPAIN
dc.titleEffects of pulsed versus conventional radiofrequency current on rabbit dorsal root ganglion morphology
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage256
oaire.citation.issue3
oaire.citation.startPage251
oaire.citation.titleEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN
oaire.citation.volume9

Files