Publication:
Patients' perspectives on the ocular symptoms of facial paralysis after gold weight implantation

dc.contributor.authorDURMUŞ KOCAASLAN, FATMA NİHAL
dc.contributor.authorBAYRAMİÇLİ, MEHMET NURİ ÜMİT
dc.contributor.authorsSoenmez, Ahmet; Oeztuerk, Nurdan; Durmus, Nihal; Bayramicli, Mehmet; Numanoglu, Ayhan
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T16:00:10Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T19:15:21Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T16:00:10Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.description.abstractUpper lid loading for the treatment of lagophthalmos resulting from facial paralysis is a simple and effective procedure with relatively few side effects and complications. A detailed patient-based self assessment, focusing on subjective complaints after upper lid weight implantation is scarce. In this study, a population of facial palsy patients with lid weights is asked about their subjective complaints in order to find out the patients' point of view. Patients with upper lid weights were asked questions indicating the degree of soreness, tearing, redness, visual acuity, lid closing during the day, lid closing during steep, aesthetic appearance, artificial tear utilisation and outdoor comfort. All questions were evaluated by an analogue scale in reference to the opposite eye, where a score of '10' corresponds to the best outcome (no symptoms at all or appearance comparable to the contralateral eye) and a score of '1' corresponds to the worst outcome. Thirty patients filled in the questionnaire and 22 of them were seen in the outpatient clinic. The most pleasing result was obtained in the lid closing during the day (score 8.8 +/- 1.9), during sleep (7.7 +/- 3.0) and in the aesthetic appearance of the eye (score 7.6 +/- 2.7), whereas visual acuity received the lowest score (score 5.7 +/- 1.5). Complication and re-operation rates were 23% and 13%, respectively. In conclusion, upper lid weights solve the problem they are used to address. They provide a satisfactory lid closure and aesthetic appearance in the patients' point of view. However, the ocular symptoms of facial paralysis still persist to some extent and the procedure is not without its complications. (C) 2007 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.bjps.2007.06.019
dc.identifier.eissn1878-0539
dc.identifier.issn1748-6815
dc.identifier.pubmed17664087
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/224606
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000259881600013
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherELSEVIER SCI LTD
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectFacial paralysis
dc.subjectParalytic lagophtalmos
dc.subjectLid weight
dc.subjectPatient satisfaction
dc.subjectComplication
dc.subjectEYELID WEIGHTS
dc.subjectNERVE PALSY
dc.subjectLAGOPHTHALMOS
dc.subjectMANAGEMENT
dc.subjectMORBIDITY
dc.subjectINSERTION
dc.titlePatients' perspectives on the ocular symptoms of facial paralysis after gold weight implantation
dc.typeconferenceObject
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage1068
oaire.citation.issue9
oaire.citation.startPage1065
oaire.citation.titleJOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY
oaire.citation.volume61

Files