Publication:
The effectiveness of high-dose inhaled budesonide therapy in the treatment of acute asthma exacerbations in children

dc.contributor.authorsNuhoğlu, Y.; Bahçeciler, N. N.; Barlan, I. B.; Müjdat Başaran, M.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-15T11:12:24Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-10T20:38:49Z
dc.date.available2022-03-15T11:12:24Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend the use of systemic steroids for the treatment of acute asthma attack if it has not been resolved within 24 to 36 hours of home management with regular beta2 mimetic inhalation. Such therapy for infrequent exacerbations is unlikely to have serious systemic effects. Unfortunately, many patients receiving frequent courses are potentially at risk for corticosteroid-induced side effects such as adrenal suppression, depression of linear growth, and osteoporosis. OBJECTIVE: To decrease the use of frequent oral corticosteroid courses in children, this study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of high-dose inhaled steroids in comparison with oral steroids, in the therapy of acute asthma exacerbations in children. METHODS: Sixty children who have experienced an acute exacerbation of asthma unresponsive to home management with regular use of inhaled beta2 mimetics, yet not severe enough to hospitalize, were randomized to be treated with either high-dose inhaled budesonide (1,600 microg daily) or oral methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg daily) plus medium-dose inhaled budesonide (800 microg daily, both in addition to inhaled terbutaline, 2,000 microg daily). Pre- and posttreatment pulmonary index scores, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC and forced expiratory flow 25% to 75% (FEF25%-75%) were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean number of decrease in pulmonary index score was 2.61 +/- 1.12 in the high-dose budesonide-receiving group (group I) and 1.90 +/- 1.08 in the oral steroid-receiving group (group II). There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups, in favor of group I (P = .038). No statistically significant difference was detected between the two groups with respect to the increase in lung function test measurements (FEV1, FEV1/FVC, FEF25%-75%; P = .790, .959, .819, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term high-dose budesonide therapy can be considered an alternative for children who are experiencing an acute asthma attack that is unresponsive to home management with regular use of an inhaled beta2 mimetic, yet who are not severe enough to hospitalize.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/s1081-1206(10)63306-6
dc.identifier.issn1081-1206
dc.identifier.pubmedPMID: 11289332
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/249069
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology: Official Publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectChild
dc.subjectAdministration, Oral
dc.subjectAnti-Inflammatory Agents
dc.subjectAcute Disease
dc.subjectAdministration, Inhalation
dc.subjectAsthma
dc.subjectBudesonide
dc.subjectRespiratory Function Tests
dc.subjectMethylprednisolone
dc.subjectSympathomimetics
dc.subjectTerbutaline
dc.titleThe effectiveness of high-dose inhaled budesonide therapy in the treatment of acute asthma exacerbations in children
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage322
oaire.citation.startPage318
oaire.citation.titleAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology: Official Publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology
oaire.citation.volume3

Files