Publication:
The effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the management of patients with complex regional pain syndrome: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled prospective study

dc.contributor.authorsBilgili, Adem; Cakir, Tuncay; Dogan, Sebnem Koldas; Ercalik, Tulay; Filiz, Meral Bilgilisoy; Toraman, Fusun
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T20:28:48Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T08:33:14Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T20:28:48Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on clinical recovery in the management of patients with complex regional pain syndrome Type I (CRPS Type I). MATERIAL AND METHOD: The study included 30 patients with stage 1 and 2 CRPS Type I in the upper extremities. The patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups, group 1 (n = 15) received conventional TENS therapy for 20 minutes, and group 2 (n = 15) received sham TENS therapy. The standard physical therapy program, which included contrast bath for 20 minutes; whirlpool bath for 15 minutes; assisted active and passive range of motion, and static stretching exercises up to the pain threshold, was also conducted in both groups. Therapy was scheduled for 15 sessions. A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to assess spontaneous pain. The Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Signs and Symptoms (LANSS) scale and the Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions (DN-4) were used to assess neuropathic pain. In addition, range of motion (ROM) was measured using a goniometer and volumetric measurements were taken to assess edema. Functional capacity was assessed using a hand dynamometer and the Duruoz Hand Index (DHI). All measurements were performed at baseline and after therapy. RESULTS: Significant improvements were achieved in spontaneous and neuropathic pain scores, edema, ROM, and functional capacity in both groups (p < 0.05). However, improvement was found to be significantly greater in group 1 regarding pain intensity, neuropathic pain assessed using LANNS, edema, and in the 2nd-3rd finger ROM measurements (p < 0.05). No significant difference was detected between groups regarding improvements in 4th-5th finger and wrist ROM measurements, grip strength, and DN4 and DHI scores (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The addition of TENS to the physical therapy program was seen to make a significant contribution to clinical recovery in CRPS Type 1.
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/BMR-160667
dc.identifier.eissn1878-6324
dc.identifier.issn1053-8127
dc.identifier.pubmed26922847
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/233978
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000390249300006
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherIOS PRESS
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectComplex regional pain syndrome
dc.subjecttranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
dc.subjectpain
dc.subjectfunctional capacity
dc.subjectREFLEX SYMPATHETIC DYSTROPHY
dc.subjectNEUROPATHIC PAIN
dc.subjectPHYSICAL-THERAPY
dc.subjectHAND
dc.subjectVALIDATION
dc.subjectSCALE
dc.titleThe effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the management of patients with complex regional pain syndrome: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled prospective study
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage671
oaire.citation.issue4
oaire.citation.startPage661
oaire.citation.titleJOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION
oaire.citation.volume29

Files