Publication:
Noninvasive Assessment of Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure with Tissue Doppler Imaging in Patients with Mitral Regurgitation

dc.contributor.authorÖZBEN SADIÇ, BESTE
dc.contributor.authorYEŞİLDAĞ, OSMAN
dc.contributor.authorsYesildag, Osman; Koprulu, Diyar; Yuksel, Serkan; Soylu, Korhan; Ozben, Beste
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T18:04:51Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-10T20:23:48Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T18:04:51Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractBackground: The ratio of early transmitral flow velocity to mitral annulus early diastolic velocity (E/Ea) is a widely used noninvasive tool to estimate left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP). The aim of this study was to explore whether E/Ea ratio was a reliable index for the estimation of LVEDP in patients with mitral regurgitation (MR). Methods: Sixteen patients with nonischemic MR (primary MR group; 6 male, 58 +/- 12 years) 51 patients with ischemic MR (secondary MR group; 29 male, 63 +/- 9 years) and 29 patients without MR (control group; 19 male, 53 +/- 10 years) were consecutively included. The peak transmitral flow and mitral annular velocities during early diastole were measured. LVEDP was determined invasively by left heart catheterization. Results: Primary and secondary MR groups had significantly higher E/Ea ratios and LVEDP than control group. LVEDP significantly correlated with E/Ea ratio in patients with primary MR, but not in patients with secondary MR. Multiple regression analysis revealed that E/Ea ratio was an independent predictor of LVEDP in patients with primary MR. Ten patients with primary MR had LVEDP >= 15 mmHg. ROC analysis demonstrated cutoff values for E/Ea ratios as > 10.5 for lateral mitral annulus (sensitivity: 80%, specificity: 66%, PPV: 80%, NPV: 66%) and as > 14 for medial mitral annulus (sensitivity: 90%, specificity: 83%, PPV: 90%, NPV: 83%) to predict primary MR patients with LVEDP >= 15 mmHg. Conclusion: E/Ea ratio is still reliable in estimation of LVEDP in primary MR patients while it is not predictive for LVEDP in secondary MR patients. (Echocardiography 2011;28:633-640)
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1540-8175.2011.01393.x
dc.identifier.issn0742-2822
dc.identifier.pubmed21718351
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/230486
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000292887100014
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWILEY-BLACKWELL
dc.relation.ispartofECHOCARDIOGRAPHY-A JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ALLIED TECHNIQUES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectechocardiography
dc.subjectleft heart catheterization
dc.subjectleft ventricular end-diastolic pressure
dc.subjectmitral regurgitation
dc.subjecttissue Doppler imaging
dc.subjectPULMONARY-CAPILLARY WEDGE
dc.subjectACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION
dc.subjectTRANSMITRAL FLOW VELOCITY
dc.subjectCHRONIC HEART-FAILURE
dc.subjectFILLING PRESSURE
dc.subjectDECELERATION TIME
dc.subjectECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC INDEXES
dc.subjectPREDICTOR
dc.subjectARTERY
dc.subjectDYSFUNCTION
dc.titleNoninvasive Assessment of Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Pressure with Tissue Doppler Imaging in Patients with Mitral Regurgitation
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage640
oaire.citation.issue6
oaire.citation.startPage633
oaire.citation.titleECHOCARDIOGRAPHY-A JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ALLIED TECHNIQUES
oaire.citation.volume28

Files