Publication:
Bevacizumab plus Capecitabine as Maintenance Therapy after Initial Bevacizumab plus XELOX Treatment in Previously Untreated Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Phase Ill 'Stop and Go' Study Results - A Turkish Oncology Group Trial

dc.contributor.authorDANE, FAYSAL
dc.contributor.authorsYalcin, Suayib; Uslu, Ruchan; Dane, Faysal; Yilmaz, Ugur; Zengin, Nurullah; Buyukunal, Evin; Buyukberber, Suleyman; Camci, Celalettin; Sencan, Orhan; Kilickap, Sadettin; Ozdener, Fatih; Cevik, Duygu
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-14T10:56:33Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T08:46:37Z
dc.date.available2022-03-14T10:56:33Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractObjective: It was the aim of this study to evaluate maintenance therapy with bevacizumab + capecitabine following induction with bevacizumab + capecitabine + oxaliplatin (XELOX) versus bevacizumab + XELOX until progression as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: Patients received either bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg) + XELOX (capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 + oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks) until disease progression (arm A) or the same doses of bevacizumab + XELOX for 6 cycles followed by bevacizumab + capecitabine until disease progression (arm B). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Results: One hundred and twenty-three patients were randomized. Treatment compliance was similar in both groups. Median PFS was significantly longer for arm B than for arm A (11.0 vs. 8.3 months; p = 0.002). There was no significant difference between the two arms for ORR (66.7 vs. 59.0%; p = 0.861) or median OS (23.8 vs. 20.2 months; p = 0.100). Tolerability was acceptable in both treatment arms; the most frequent grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (arm B vs. arm A) were fatigue (6.6 vs. 16.1%), diarrhoea (3.3 vs. 11.3%), anorexia (3.3 vs. 11.3%), and neuropathy (1.6 vs. 8.1%). Conclusions: Maintenance therapy with bevacizumab + capecitabine can be considered an appropriate option following induction bevacizunnab + XELOX in patients with mCRC instead of continuation of bevacizumab + XELOX. (C) 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000355914
dc.identifier.eissn1423-0232
dc.identifier.issn0030-2414
dc.identifier.pubmed24247559
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/245541
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000329268000003
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherKARGER
dc.relation.ispartofONCOLOGY
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectBevacizumab
dc.subjectCapecitabine
dc.subjectOxaliplatin
dc.subjectMetastatic colorectal cancer
dc.subjectMaintenance therapy
dc.subject1ST-LINE THERAPY
dc.subjectFINAL REPORT
dc.subjectOXALIPLATIN
dc.subjectFLUOROURACIL
dc.subjectCHEMOTHERAPY
dc.subjectLEUCOVORIN
dc.subjectCOMBINATION
dc.subjectEFFICACY
dc.subjectINTERMITTENT
dc.subjectFOLFOX4
dc.titleBevacizumab plus Capecitabine as Maintenance Therapy after Initial Bevacizumab plus XELOX Treatment in Previously Untreated Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Phase Ill 'Stop and Go' Study Results - A Turkish Oncology Group Trial
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage335
oaire.citation.issue6
oaire.citation.startPage328
oaire.citation.titleONCOLOGY
oaire.citation.volume85

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
file.pdf
Size:
177.84 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format