Publication:
Accuracy of reported family histories of essential tremor

dc.contributor.authorsBusenbark, K; Barnes, P; Lyons, K; Ince, D; Villagra, F; Koller, WC
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T16:57:07Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-10T17:59:47Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T16:57:07Z
dc.date.issued1996
dc.description.abstractWe studied the accuracy of reported family histories of essential tremor (ET) by questioning the patients in our clinic and subsequently by mail and phone. For individuals who continued to report a negative family history, we mailed a screening questionnaire to their first-degree relatives to further ascertain the presence of ET. On initial assessment, 67.7% of patients reported a positive family history of ET, but following all assessments, 96.0% of patients had a positive family history. We conclude that a negative family history of ET is often inaccurate, and that ET is primarily a hereditary disease.
dc.identifier.doi10.1212/WNL.47.1.264
dc.identifier.issn0028-3878
dc.identifier.pubmed8710092
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/226886
dc.identifier.wosWOS:A1996UX18800048
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherLITTLE BROWN CO
dc.relation.ispartofNEUROLOGY
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.titleAccuracy of reported family histories of essential tremor
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage265
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.startPage264
oaire.citation.titleNEUROLOGY
oaire.citation.volume47

Files