Publication:
Comparison between two conical induction machines designed for an electric vehicle application

dc.contributor.authorsDemir U., Roggia S., Akuner M.C.
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-15T02:14:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-10T18:46:46Z
dc.date.available2022-03-15T02:14:23Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.abstractThis study focuses on the comparison between two conical machines designed for an electrical-vehicle application. An optimal case, with an optimal cone angle, is compared to a worst-case scenario where the tapering is increased up to the maximum allowed dimensions. Simulations show that when the cone angle is not appropriately chosen the advantages that a tapered motor can offer over a classical cylindrical machine can be lost. In order to show the worsening effects of a not well pondered cone angle choice, a prototype of the conical machine with the largest conical dimensions has been built. The results obtained using finite element models (FEM) have been confirmed through experimental tests demonstrating the validity of the numerical analyses. © 2019 IEEE.
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/IEMDC.2019.8785320
dc.identifier.isbn9781538693490
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/248033
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
dc.relation.ispartof2019 IEEE International Electric Machines and Drives Conference, IEMDC 2019
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectElectric vehicle
dc.subjectIn-wheel motor
dc.subjectInduction motor
dc.subjectTapered rotor geometry
dc.subjectTraction motor
dc.titleComparison between two conical induction machines designed for an electric vehicle application
dc.typeconferenceObject
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage1037
oaire.citation.startPage1032
oaire.citation.title2019 IEEE International Electric Machines and Drives Conference, IEMDC 2019

Files