Publication:
Fracture Resistance of Ceramic Veneers with Different Preparation Designs

dc.contributor.authorsAkoglu, Burcin; Gemalmaz, Deniz
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-12T17:50:17Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-11T06:11:17Z
dc.date.available2022-03-12T17:50:17Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the fracture load of ceramic veneers with different preparation designs. Materials and Methods: Seventy-five extracted, intact, human maxillary central incisors were prepared according to five preparation designs (P) (n: 15) as follows: (1) P2e: 2-mm incisal reduction, preparation entirely in enamel; (2) P4e: 4-mm incisal reduction, preparation entirely in enamel; (3) P2d: 2-mm incisal reduction, preparation entirely in dentin; (4) P4d: 4-mm incisal reduction, preparation entirely in dentin; and (6) Pc: Unrestored, intact teeth as control. All preparations had a butt joint incisal finish line, rounded internal line angles, and cervical finish lines 1 mm above the cementoenamel junction. Ceramic veneers were fabricated with IPS Empress (Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Schaan, Liechtenstein) and cemented with Syntac Classic Adhesive system and Variolink II (Ivoclar) resin cement. Veneers were loaded until fracture at a 90 degrees angle to the lingual surface of the test tooth following the thermocycling process (5 degrees to 55 degrees, 3500 times). Statistical analyses were performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's Multiple Range Test. Results: The mean fracture loads (SD) were (in N) as follows: (1) P2e: 262 (63); (2) P4e: 189 (40); (3) P2d: 239 (53); (4) P4d: 162 (36); and (5) Pc: 277 (66). The amount of incisal reduction exhibited a significant influence on fracture resistance regardless of the preparation depth (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Ceramic veneers with preparation designs entirely on dentin with 4-mm incisal reduction yielded lower fracture loads than those prepared with 2-mm incisal reduction. Veneers with 2-mm incisal reduction exhibited fracture resistance similar to that of intact teeth for preparation designs supplied on both enamel and dentin.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00728.x
dc.identifier.issn1059-941X
dc.identifier.pubmed21631629
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11424/230152
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000292911700008
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWILEY-BLACKWELL
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectLaminate veneer
dc.subjectfracture
dc.subjectdentin
dc.subjectpreparation design
dc.subjectPORCELAIN LAMINATE VENEERS
dc.subjectIN-VITRO
dc.subjectMARGINAL ADAPTATION
dc.subjectANTERIOR TEETH
dc.subjectFAILURE
dc.subjectMICROLEAKAGE
dc.subjectRESTORATIONS
dc.subjectCROWN
dc.subjectLOAD
dc.titleFracture Resistance of Ceramic Veneers with Different Preparation Designs
dc.typearticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage384
oaire.citation.issue5
oaire.citation.startPage380
oaire.citation.titleJOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY
oaire.citation.volume20

Files